Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34995293›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

A deep hybrid learning pipeline for accurate diagnosis of ovarian cancer based on nuclear morphology.

Duhita Sengupta, Sk Nishan Ali, Aditya Bhattacharya, Joy Mustafi, Asima Mukhopadhyay, Kaushik Sengupta

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Role of artificial intelligence in digital pathology for gynecological cancers.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Duhita SenguptaBiophysics and Structural Genomics Division, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Sk Nishan AliArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Division, MUST Research Trust, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Aditya BhattacharyaArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Division, MUST Research Trust, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Joy MustafiArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Division, MUST Research Trust, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Asima MukhopadhyayChittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Newtown, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Kaushik SenguptaBiophysics and Structural Genomics Division, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4531-3137

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear morphological features are potent determining factors for clinical diagnostic approaches adopted by pathologists to analyze the malignant potential of cancer cells. Considering the structural alteration of the nucleus in cancer cells, various groups have developed machine learning techniques based on variation in nuclear morphometric information like nuclear shape, size, nucleus-cytoplasm ratio and various non-parametric methods like deep learning have also been tested for analyzing immunohistochemistry images of tissue samples for diagnosing various cancers. We aim to correlate the morphometric features of the nucleus along with the distribution of nuclear lamin proteins with classical machine learning to differentiate between normal and ovarian cancer tissues. It has already been elucidated that in ovarian cancer, the extent of alteration in nuclear shape and morphology can modulate genetic changes and thus can be utilized to predict the outcome of low to a high form of serous carcinoma. In this work, we have performed exhaustive imaging of ovarian cancer versus normal tissue and developed a dual pipeline architecture that combines the matrices of morphometric parameters with deep learning techniques of auto feature extraction from pre-processed images. This novel Deep Hybrid Learning model, though derived from classical machine learning algorithms and standard CNN, showed a training and validation AUC score of 0.99 whereas the test AUC score turned out to be 1.00. The improved feature engineering enabled us to differentiate between cancerous and non-cancerous samples successfully from this pilot study.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArea Under CurveCell NucleusCell Nucleus ShapeCell Nucleus SizeDeep LearningDiagnostic ImagingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerNuclear LaminaOvarian NeoplasmsPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID34995293
PMCPMC8741040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.