Trial reportPloS one2022
Identification of an early-stage Parkinson's disease neuromarker using event-related potentials, brain network analytics and machine-learning.
Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Behavioral changes preceded by subthalamic nucleus activity alterations in a progressive macaque model of Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- EEG microstate features under visual feedback gain conditions exhibit high sensitivity in identifying early Parkinson's disease patients.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Stimulus-Evoked Brain Signals for Parkinson's Detection: A Comprehensive Benchmark Performance Analysis on Cross-Stimulation and Channel-Wise Experiments.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Independent component analysis of oddball EEG recordings to detect Parkinson's disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- AI-Driven Advances in Parkinson's Disease Neurosurgery: Enhancing Patient Selection, Trial Efficiency, and Therapeutic Outcomes.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Electrophysiological alterations during action semantic processing in Parkinson's disease.Neurobiology of aging · 2024Article
- An interpretable model based on graph learning for diagnosis of Parkinson's disease with voice-related EEG.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- From Recognition to Remedy: The Significance of Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Disease Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Physiological Recordings of the Cerebellum in Movement Disorders.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2023Review
- Evaluation of Parkinson's disease early diagnosis using single-channel EEG features and auditory cognitive assessment.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study is to explore the possibility of developing a biomarker that can discriminate early-stage Parkinson's disease from healthy brain function using electroencephalography (EEG) event-related potentials (ERPs) in combination with Brain Network Analytics (BNA) technology and machine learning (ML) algorithms.
backgroundCurrently, diagnosis of PD depends mainly on motor signs and symptoms. However, there is need for biomarkers that detect PD at an earlier stage to allow intervention and monitoring of potential disease-modifying therapies. Cognitive impairment may appear before motor symptoms, and it tends to worsen with disease progression. While ERPs obtained during cognitive tasks performance represent processing stages of cognitive brain functions, they have not yet been established as sensitive or specific markers for early-stage PD.
methodsNineteen PD patients (disease duration of ≤2 years) and 30 healthy controls (HC) underwent EEG recording while performing visual Go/No-Go and auditory Oddball cognitive tasks. ERPs were analyzed by the BNA technology, and a ML algorithm identified a combination of features that distinguish early PD from HC. We used a logistic regression classifier with a 10-fold cross-validation.
resultsThe ML algorithm identified a neuromarker comprising 15 BNA features that discriminated early PD patients from HC. The area-under-the-curve of the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.79. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.74 and 0.73, respectively. The five most important features could be classified into three cognitive functions: early sensory processing (P50 amplitude, N100 latency), filtering of information (P200 amplitude and topographic similarity), and response-locked activity (P-200 topographic similarity preceding the motor response in the visual Go/No-Go task).
conclusionsThis pilot study found that BNA can identify patients with early PD using an advanced analysis of ERPs. These results need to be validated in a larger PD patient sample and assessed for people with premotor phase of PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.