ArticleInternational journal of cancer2022
Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative-intent resection of colorectal liver metastases.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Circulating tumour DNA-Based molecular residual disease detection in resectable cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EBioMedicine · 2024Pooled it
- Circulating Tumour DNA as Biomarker for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cells · 2023Pooled it
- Circulating Tumor DNA as a Minimal Residual Disease Assessment and Recurrence Risk in Patients Undergoing Curative-Intent Resection with or without Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Impact of methodological variability on the prognostic performance of circulating tumor DNA in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Review
- Article
- High Sensitivity ctDNA Analysis Using a Novel Panel and NOIR-SS Technology for Monitoring Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Evidence Mapping of ctDNA Reporting in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Toward a Shared Quantitative Language for ctDNA.Cancers · 2026Review
- New prognostic and predictive scoring systems for colorectal cancer liver metastases.ESMO open · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Understanding the Tumor Microenvironmental Mechanisms Driving Immunotherapy Resistance in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Long-term survival and prognostic factors after repeated metastasectomies in metastatic colorectal cancer: a 15-years retrospective study.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Monitoring and Assessment of Circulating Tumor DNA in Cancers Using Ultrarapid Sensitivity as an Innovative Practice.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Liver Metastases: An Exhaustive Review of the Literature and Future Prospectives.Cancers · 2025Review
- Review
- Detection of KRAS Mutations Using Extracellular Vesicle DNA in Colorectal Cancer Patients.Cancer science · 2025Observational
- Impact of Minimal Residual Disease on Early Recurrence of Liver Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Cancer science · 2025Observational
- Circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker of prognosis prediction in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025Article
- Establishing a Common Lexicon for Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis and Molecular Residual Disease: Insights From the BLOODPAC Consortium.Clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- A new paradigm in postoperative colorectal cancer surveillance: integrating advanced imaging and multi-omics.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recurrence rate of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients treated with curative intent is above 50%. Standard of care surveillance includes intensive computed tomographic (CT) imaging as well as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurements. Nonetheless, relapse detection often happens too late to resume curative treatment. This longitudinal cohort study enrolled 115 patients with plasma samples (N = 439) prospectively collected before surgery, postoperatively at day 30 and every third month for up to 3 years. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used to monitor serial plasma samples for somatic mutations. Assessment of ctDNA status either immediately after surgery, or serially during surveillance, stratified the patients into groups of high and low recurrence risk (hazard ratio [HR], 7.6; 95% CI, 3.0-19.7; P < .0001; and HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.3-8.1; P < .0001, respectively). The positive predictive value (PPV) of ctDNA was 100% in all postoperative analyses. In multivariable analyses, postoperative ctDNA status was the only consistently significant risk marker associated with relapse (P < .0001). Indeterminate CT findings were observed for 30.8% (21/68) of patients. All patients (9/21) that were ctDNA positive at the time of the indeterminate CT scan later relapsed, contrasting 42.6% (5/12) of those ctDNA negative (P = .0046). Recurrence diagnoses in patients with indeterminate CT findings were delayed (median 2.8 months, P < .0001). ctDNA status is strongly associated with detection of minimal residual disease and early detection of relapse. Furthermore, ctDNA status can potentially contribute to clinical decision-making in case of indeterminate CT findings, reducing time-to-intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.