Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34994967›Full record

ReviewDermatology and therapy2022

Current Methods and Caveats to Risk Factor Assessment in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC): A Narrative Review.

Aaron S Farberg, Alison L Fitzgerald, Sherrif F Ibrahim, Stan N Tolkachjov, Teo Soleymani, Leah M Douglas, Sarah J Kurley, Sarah T Arron

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Treatment benefit of electrochemotherapy for superficial squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. INHBA: A Protein-coding Gene Closely Related to Tumour Diseases.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Using Gene Expression Profiling to Personalize Skin Cancer Management.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aaron S FarbergBaylor Scott & White Health System, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Aaron.Farberg@gmail.com.
Alison L FitzgeraldCastle Biosciences, Inc., Friendswood, TX, USA.
Sherrif F IbrahimUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Stan N TolkachjovEpiphany Dermatology, Dallas, TX, USA.
Teo SoleymaniUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Leah M DouglasBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Sarah J KurleyCastle Biosciences, Inc., Friendswood, TX, USA.
Sarah T ArronPeninsula Dermatology, Burlingame, CA, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine · USBaylor Scott & White Health · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common form of skin cancer, and the number of deaths due to cSCC is estimated to be greater than the number attributed to melanoma. While the majority of cSCC tumors are resectable with clear margins by standard excision practices, some lesions exhibit high-risk factors for which there is evidence of their association with recurrence, metastasis, and disease-specific death. The most commonly used staging systems and guidelines in the USA for cSCC are based on these clinical and pathologic high-risk factors; however, these are limited in their ability to predict adverse events, thus posing a challenge for implementing risk-directed patient management. Since the development of local recurrence and/or metastasis has a profound impact on the survival of patients with cSCC, accurate identification of patients at high risk for poor outcomes is critical, potentially allowing for early and appropriate adjuvant therapy. This review summarizes the current cSCC literature with a focus on how differing clinical assessments within each of the five selected risk factors (perineural invasion, differentiation, depth of invasion, size, and location) can influence the evaluation of patient outcomes, along with summarizing the utility of staging and guidelines, and highlighting the potential for molecular tools to improve upon cSCC risk assessment.

Indexed as

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomaMolecular prognosticationOutcomesRisk factorsStaging

Identifiers

PMID34994967
PMCPMC8850485
OpenAlexW4205480244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.