ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022
Arsenic in soils contaminated by arsenic-containing chemical weapons in a site of Jilin, China: fraction and bioaccessibility.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- A review on arsenic in the environment: contamination, mobility, sources, and exposure.RSC advances · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
At the end of World War II, the Japanese abandoned arsenic (As)-containing chemical weapons (CWs) in China. During the long-term burial process, the As-containing agents leaked into the environment due to the corrosion of weapon shells. This study explored the surface distribution, fraction composition, and bioaccessibility of As in the soil contaminated by chemical weapons in a site of Jilin Province, China. Results showed that As was enriched in the soil of CWs buried and the maximum concentration of As in this area was 110 mg/kg (dry weight). In terms of fraction, As primarily accumulated in amorphous Fe/Al-oxides bound and residual fractions. Moreover, from the perspective of fractions with potential environmental risks, As accounted for 45.6-82.0% and 61.0-80.7% of the fractions extracted by Wenzel and Shiowatana sequential extraction procedure (SEP), respectively. Bioaccessibility can also be used to assess environmental risks. The mean values of As bioaccessibility were as follows: gastric phase (15.0%) > colon phase (14.8%) > small intestinal phase (13.3%), and the As bioaccessibility was closely related to the Fe/Al oxide bound fraction. Compared with the surrounding farmland, the potential environmental risk of soil pollution was more significant in the CW burial areas. This study provided support for remediation of As-containing agent-contaminated soil in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.