Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34994885›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Impact of Gemcitabine Plus S1 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Borderline Resectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Ryusei Matsuyama, Ryutaro Mori, Yohei Ota, Yuki Homma, Yasuhiro Yabusita, Seigo Hiratani, Takashi Murakami, Yu Sawada, Kentaro Miyake, Yasuhiro Shimizu and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Changing concepts in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma resections and surgery.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryusei MatsuyamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan. ryusei@terra.dti.ne.jp.
Ryutaro MoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yohei OtaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yuki HommaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yasuhiro YabusitaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Seigo HirataniDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Takashi MurakamiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yu SawadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Kentaro MiyakeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yasuhiro ShimizuDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Takafumi KumamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Itaru EndoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical resection is the only curative strategy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), but recurrence rates are high even after purported curative resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine/S-1 (GS) combination chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.

methodsIn an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with GS, repeated every 21 days, was administered for three cycles to patients with histologic or cytologically confirmed borderline resectable (BR) PHC who were eligible for inclusion in the study. In this study, BR PHC was defined as positive for lymph node metastasis and for cancerous vascular invasion or Bismuth type 4 on preoperative imaging. The primary end point consisted of the 3- and 5-year survival rates. The secondary end points were feasibility, resection rate, and pathologic effect.

resultsThe study enrolled 60 patients between January 2011 and December 2016. With respect to toxicity, the major adverse effect was neutropenia, which reached grade 3 or 4 in 53.3% of cases. The overall disease control rate was 91.3%. The median survival time for the entire cohort was 30.3 months. For all the patients, the estimated 3-year survival rate was 44.1%, and the 5-year survival rate was 30.0%. Resection with curative intent was performed for 43 (71%) of the 60 patients. For 81% of the resected patients, R0 resection was performed, and Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complications or a higher morbidity rate was seen in 41% of the patients. The median survival time was 50.1 months for the resected and 14.8 months for the unresected patients. For the resected patients, the estimated 3-year survival rate was 55.8%, and the estimated 5-year survival rate was 36.4%.

conclusionsGemcitabine/S-1 combination NAC has promising efficacy and good tolerability for patients with BR PHC.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsKlatskin TumorPancreatic NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDeoxycytidineGemcitabineHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyDeoxycytidineGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID34994885
OpenAlexW4206446979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.