Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2022
Impact of Gemcitabine Plus S1 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Borderline Resectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.
Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chinese national clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract cancers.Chinese medical journal · 2024Guideline
- Surgical Safety after Preoperative Chemotherapy for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Multi-Institutional Propensity-Matched Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Observational
- ASO Author Reflections: Borderline Resectability in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma - Anatomic and Biologic Considerations.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Anatomic-Biologic Borderline Resectability Criteria Improve Recurrence Risk Stratification in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Changing concepts in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma resections and surgery.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Real-World Single-Center Experience with Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Durvalumab in Borderline Resectable Cholangiocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- A Multicenter Retrospective Study on Adjuvant S-1 Chemotherapy Versus Observation Following Major Hepatectomy for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Conversion therapy in advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma based on patient-derived organoids: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- The Short- and Long-Term Surgical Results of Consecutive Hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy for Wide-Spread Biliary Malignancy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Essential updates 2021/2022: Update in surgical strategy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2023Review
- Rational Extent of Regional Lymphadenectomy and the Prognostic Impact of the Number of Positive Lymph Nodes for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Current Perspectives in Liver Transplantation for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical resection is the only curative strategy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), but recurrence rates are high even after purported curative resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine/S-1 (GS) combination chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
methodsIn an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with GS, repeated every 21 days, was administered for three cycles to patients with histologic or cytologically confirmed borderline resectable (BR) PHC who were eligible for inclusion in the study. In this study, BR PHC was defined as positive for lymph node metastasis and for cancerous vascular invasion or Bismuth type 4 on preoperative imaging. The primary end point consisted of the 3- and 5-year survival rates. The secondary end points were feasibility, resection rate, and pathologic effect.
resultsThe study enrolled 60 patients between January 2011 and December 2016. With respect to toxicity, the major adverse effect was neutropenia, which reached grade 3 or 4 in 53.3% of cases. The overall disease control rate was 91.3%. The median survival time for the entire cohort was 30.3 months. For all the patients, the estimated 3-year survival rate was 44.1%, and the 5-year survival rate was 30.0%. Resection with curative intent was performed for 43 (71%) of the 60 patients. For 81% of the resected patients, R0 resection was performed, and Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complications or a higher morbidity rate was seen in 41% of the patients. The median survival time was 50.1 months for the resected and 14.8 months for the unresected patients. For the resected patients, the estimated 3-year survival rate was 55.8%, and the estimated 5-year survival rate was 36.4%.
conclusionsGemcitabine/S-1 combination NAC has promising efficacy and good tolerability for patients with BR PHC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.