Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34994840›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2022

Anxiety and pain perception using a speculum-free eyelid retraction technique for intravitreal injection.

Lauren M Wasser, Eduardo Roditi, Adina R Weiss, Yishay Weill, Meni Koslowsky, David Zadok, Joel Hanhart, Itay Magal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren M Wasser *Department of Ophthalmology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center Affiliated with the Hebrew University - Hadassah School of Medicine, 9103102, Jerusalem, Israel. lauriew21@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6093-1996
Eduardo Roditi *Department of Ophthalmology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center Affiliated with the Hebrew University - Hadassah School of Medicine, 9103102, Jerusalem, Israel.
Adina R WeissDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center Affiliated with the Hebrew University - Hadassah School of Medicine, 9103102, Jerusalem, Israel.
Yishay WeillDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center Affiliated with the Hebrew University - Hadassah School of Medicine, 9103102, Jerusalem, Israel.
Meni KoslowskyDepartments of Psychology, Ariel University, 44837, Ariel, Israel.
David ZadokDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center Affiliated with the Hebrew University - Hadassah School of Medicine, 9103102, Jerusalem, Israel.
Joel HanhartDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center Affiliated with the Hebrew University - Hadassah School of Medicine, 9103102, Jerusalem, Israel.
Itay MagalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center Affiliated with the Hebrew University - Hadassah School of Medicine, 9103102, Jerusalem, Israel.
Shaare Zedek Medical Center · ILBar-Ilan University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study compared pain and anxiety levels in individuals receiving intravitreal injections (IVIs) using a speculum-free injection technique, the lid splinting eyelid retraction technique, or using a speculum.

methodsThis was a prospective study of individuals receiving IVI at a single tertiary care medical center who responded to a questionnaire and visual analog scale (VAS) between December 2019 and January 2020. In one group, a speculum was used prior to injection, whereas in the other group, a speculum-free injection technique was used.

resultsA total of 108 individuals were included in this study: 54 received IVI with the speculum-free lid splinting eyelid retraction technique and 54 received IVI with a speculum. A correlation between pain and anxiety was demonstrated in the control group (p-value < 0.01); however, in the speculum-free group, this correlation was lower and not significant. When comparing pain and anxiety between the study groups, lower median pain (Mood's: Z = 5.378, p-value < 0.001) and lower anxiety (Mood's: Z = 2.108, p-value = 0.035) scores were demonstrated in the speculum-free group than in the control group. The distribution of pain scores was significantly different between the study groups (Kolmogorov-Smirnov: D = 0.518, p-value < 0.001), and trending differences in anxiety between the groups were observed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov: D = 0.259, p-value = 0.053).

conclusionThe lid splinting eyelid retraction technique, a speculum-free technique, was associated with less anxiety and pain in patients than the use of a speculum. As IVI often involves repeated treatment, identifying modifiable factors that may relieve anxiety and pain is of utmost importance.

Indexed as

EyelidsPain PerceptionAnxietyHumansIntravitreal InjectionsPainProspective StudiesSurgical InstrumentsAnxietyIntravitreal injectionLid splinting eyelid retraction techniquePainSpeculum

Identifiers

PMID34994840
OpenAlexW4205958740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.