Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34994777›Full record

Trial reportTranslational vision science & technology2022

Exploratory Phase II Multicenter, Open-Label, Clinical Trial of ST266, a Novel Secretome for Treatment of Persistent Corneal Epithelial Defects.

Bennie H Jeng, Pedram Hamrah, Ziv Z Kirshner, Benjamin C Mendez, Howard C Wessel, Larry R Brown, David L Steed

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03687632 (A Phase 2 Open Label Trial of ST266 Eye Drops in the Treatment of Persistent Corneal Epithelial Defects), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03687632 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2 Open Label Trial of ST266 Eye Drops in the Treatment of Persistent Corneal Epithelial Defects

TypeinterventionalSponsorNoveome Biotherapeutics, formerly StemnionRan2019 to 2020Enrolled13ConditionsPersistent Corneal Epithelial DefectArmsST266
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Amniotic fluid: its role in fetal development and beyond.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Amniotic Membrane and Amniotic Epithelial Cell Culture.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bennie H JengDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Pedram HamrahDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ziv Z KirshnerNoveome Biotherapeutics, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Benjamin C MendezNoveome Biotherapeutics, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Howard C WesselNoveome Biotherapeutics, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Larry R BrownNoveome Biotherapeutics, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
David L SteedNoveome Biotherapeutics, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tufts University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: An exploratory phase II, multicenter, open-label, clinical trial (NCT03687632) was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness in treating persistent corneal epithelial defects (PEDs) with ST266, a proprietary novel multi-cytokine platform biologic solution secreted by cultured Amnion-derived Multipotent Progenitor (AMP) cells. Methods: Subjects with a PED were treated with ST266 eye drops 4 times daily for 28 days, then followed for 1 week. Safety was assessed by monitoring of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Efficacy was assessed by measuring the area of the PED by slit lamp biomicroscopy. Tolerability of ST266, percentage of eyes with complete healing, reduction in area of the epithelial defect, and maintenance of a reduction in the area of the epithelial defect 7 days after treatment were recorded. Results: Thirteen patients were enrolled into the trial at one of eight sites. The first patient withdrew after 5 days. The remaining 12 patients with PEDs with median duration of 39 days (range = 12 to 393 days) completed treatment. Ten of the 12 eyes had been refractory to treatment with various conventional therapies prior to enrollment. After 28 days of treatment, there was a significant decrease in mean PED area compared with baseline (66.4% ± 35.3%, P = 0.001). At follow-up, 1 week after completion of treatment, on day 35, the PED area was further reduced by 78.8% ± 37.5% (P = 0.01) compared with baseline. During 28 days of treatment, 5 eyes (41.7%) had complete wound closure. There were no AEs of concern thought to be related to the drug, and no SAEs were noted. Conclusions: In this trial, we found ST266 eye drops might promote corneal epithelization, thereby reducing the PED area, including in refractory cases in a wide range of etiologies. ST266 was well-tolerated by most patients.

Indexed as

Corneal DiseasesSecretomeAmnionHumansOphthalmic SolutionsWound HealingOphthalmic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID34994777
PMCPMC8742509
OpenAlexW4206409169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.