ArticleJMIR formative research2022
Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs With Wearable Sensors During Daily Life Activities: Validation Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Remote monitoring technologies for measuring cardiovascular functions in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review.GeroScience · 2023Pooled it
- Data availability and usability of a remote device for vital sign monitoring on general wards and home: a single-center prospective, observational study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Observational
- Development and validation of an integrated wearable system for continuous cardiorespiratory monitoring using photoplethysmography and optical respiratory detection.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Optimizing accelerometer implementation in a gerotherapeutic trial: Feasibility, adherence, and operational insights of ABLE.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- The Representation of Different Populations in Studies Assessing the Validity of Consumer Wearable Photoplethysmography-Based Measurements: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- mHealth-Enabled Stroke Screening for Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease in Low-Resource Settings: Systematic Literature Review of Critical Barriers, Emerging Technologies, and AI-Driven Solutions.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Review
- Wireless patches for continuous vital sign monitoring, symptoms and medication at the end-of-life in the palliative care unit: A prospective observational study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Observational
- Translational Methods for Wearable Heart Rate Variability Monitoring in Older Adults: Preoperative Risk Stratification and Postoperative Monitoring.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Article
- Detecting changes in health and daily activities using environmental and electricity sensors and machine learning.Health and technology · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Multi-Lead ECG Reconstruction from Lead I with Metadata Integration and Uncertainty Estimation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An App-Based Remote Patient Monitoring System With Wrist and In-Ear Wearables in Gastrointestinal Oncology: Prospective Feasibility Pilot Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Reliability of an all-in-one wearable sensor for continuous vital signs monitoring in high-risk patients: the NIGHTINGALE clinical validation study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Observational
- Real-Time Auto-Monitoring of Livestock: Quantitative Framework and Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in the Wearable Devices for Monitoring and Management of Heart Failure.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Validity and Reliability of Wearable Sensors for Continuous Postoperative Vital Signs Monitoring in Patients Recovering from Trauma Surgery.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Observational
- Reliable Contactless Monitoring of Heart Rate, Breathing Rate, and Breathing Disturbance During Sleep in Aging: Digital Health Technology Evaluation Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Article
- Continuous Monitoring of Heart Rate Variability in Free-Living Conditions Using Wearable Sensors: Exploratory Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Continuous Temperature Telemonitoring of Patients with COVID-19 and Other Infectious Diseases Treated in Hospital-at-Home: VitureSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuous telemonitoring of vital signs in a clinical or home setting may lead to improved knowledge of patients' baseline vital signs and earlier detection of patient deterioration, and it may also facilitate the migration of care toward home. Little is known about the performance of available wearable sensors, especially during daily life activities, although accurate technology is critical for clinical decision-making.
objectiveThe aim of this study is to assess the data availability, accuracy, and concurrent validity of vital sign data measured with wearable sensors in volunteers during various daily life activities in a simulated free-living environment.
methodsVolunteers were equipped with 4 wearable sensors (Everion placed on the left and right arms, VitalPatch, and Fitbit Charge 3) and 2 reference devices (Oxycon Mobile and iButton) to obtain continuous measurements of heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation (SpO
resultsA total of 20 volunteers (median age 64 years, range 20-74 years) were included. Data availability was high for all vital signs measured by VitalPatch and for HR and temperature measured by Everion. Data availability for HR was the lowest for Fitbit (4807/13,680, 35.14% missing data points). For SpO
conclusionsData availability, accuracy, and concurrent validity of the studied wearable sensors varied and differed according to activity. In this study, the accuracy of all sensors decreased with physical activity. Of the tested sensors, VitalPatch was found to be the most accurate and valid for vital signs monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.