ArticleVeterinary surgery : VS2022
Electroceutical treatment of infected chronic wounds in a dog and a cat.
Article in Veterinary surgery : VS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the Effects of Autologous Leukocyte- and Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membranes for Treating Chronic Wounds: A Prospective Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Dual action electrochemical bandage operated by a programmable multimodal wearable potentiostat.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2025Article
- Article
- Activity of a hypochlorous acid-producing electrochemical bandage as assessed with a porcine explant biofilm model.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2023Article
- Anti-Biofilm Activity of a Tunable Hypochlorous Acid-Generating Electrochemical Bandage Controlled By a Wearable Potentiostat.Advanced engineering materials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo describe the use of an innovative printed electroceutical dressing (PED) to treat non-healing, infected chronic wounds in one dog and one cat and report outcomes. ANIMALS: A 4-year-old female spayed Mastiff and a 1-year-old female spayed domestic shorthair cat. STUDY
designShort case series.
methodsBoth cases had chronic wounds (duration: approximately 1 year for the dog and 6 3/4 months for the cat) that remained open and infected despite various wound management strategies. Both animals were treated with the PED. Observations from the records regarding wound size, antimicrobial susceptibility, and the time to healing were recorded.
resultsAfter 10 days of PED treatment in the dog and 17 days of PED treatment in the cat, the wounds had decreased in size by approximately 4.2 times in the dog and 2.5 times in the cat. Culture of punch biopsies yielded negative results. Wounds were clinically healed at 67 days in the dog and 47 days in the cat. No further treatment of the wounds was required beyond that point.
conclusionApplication of a PED led to closure of two chronic wounds and resolution of their persistent infection. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: PEDs may provide a new treatment modality to mitigate infection and promote healing of chronic wounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.