Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34994401›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2022

Lessons learned and keys to success: Provider experiences during the implementation of virtual oncology tumor boards in the era of COVID-19.

Breanna Perlmutter, Sayf Al-Deen Said, Mir Shanaz Hossain, Robert Simon, Daniel Joyce, R Matthew Walsh, Toms Augustin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Are multidisciplinary team meetings remotely efficient?The British journal of surgery · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Breanna PerlmutterDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6546-3909
Sayf Al-Deen SaidDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Mir Shanaz HossainDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Robert SimonDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Daniel JoyceDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
R Matthew WalshDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Toms AugustinDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic required rapid adaptation of multidisciplinary tumor board conferences to a virtual setting; however, there are little data describing the benefits and challenges of using such a platform.

methodsAn anonymous quality improvement survey was sent to participants of tumor board meetings at a large academic institution. Participants answered questions pertaining to the relative strengths and weaknesses of in-person and virtual settings.

resultsA total of 335 responses (23.3% response rate) were recorded, and 253 met inclusion criteria. Respondents represented 25 different tumor board meetings, with colorectal, breast, and liver (18.6%, 17.0%, and 13.0%, respectively) being the most commonly attended. Virtual tumor boards were equivalent to in-person across 9 of 10 domains queried, while a virtual format was preferred for participation in off-site tumor boards. The lack of networking opportunities was ranked by physicians to be a significant challenge of the virtual format. Consistent leadership and organization, engaged participation of all attendees, and upgrading technology infrastructure were considered critical for success of virtual meetings.

conclusionsThe implementation of virtual tumor board meetings has been associated with numerous challenges. However, improving several key aspects can improve participant satisfaction and ensure excellent patient care.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19HumansInterprofessional RelationsMedical OncologyQuality ImprovementSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineCOVID-19MDTmultidisciplinary teamtumor boardvirtual

Identifiers

PMID34994401
PMCPMC9015483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.