Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34994089›Full record

ArticlePest management science2022

Miticidal activity of fenazaquin and fenpyroximate against Varroa destructor, an ectoparasite of Apis mellifera.

Rassol Bahreini, Medhat Nasr, Cassandra Docherty, Samantha Muirhead, Olivia de Herdt, David Feindel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pest management science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Toxicity of λ-cyhalothrin and fenpyroximate on Nannotrigona testaceicornis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rassol BahreiniPlant and Bee Health Surveillance Section, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2014-1463
Medhat NasrPlant and Bee Health Surveillance Section, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Cassandra DochertyPlant and Bee Health Surveillance Section, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Samantha MuirheadPlant and Bee Health Surveillance Section, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Olivia de HerdtPlant and Bee Health Surveillance Section, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
David FeindelPlant and Bee Health Surveillance Section, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Funding

Alberta Beekeepers CommissionAlberta Crop Industry Development FundGrowing Forward 2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Varroa mite (Varroa destructor) is an ectoparasite that can affect the health of honey bees (Apis mellifera) and contributes to the loss of colony productivity. The limited availability of Varroacides with different modes of action in Canada has resulted in the development of chemical resistance in mite populations. Therefore, an urgent need to evaluate new potential miticides that are safe for bees and exhibit high efficacy against Varroa exists. In this study, the acute contact toxicity of 26 active ingredients (19 chemical classes), already available on the market, was evaluated on V. destructor and A. mellifera under laboratory conditions using an apiarium bioassay. In this assay, groups of Varroa-infested worker bees were exposed to different dilutions of candidate compounds. In semi-field trials, Varroa-infested honey bees were randomly treated with four vetted candidate compounds from the apiarium assay in mini-colonies.

resultsAmong tested compounds, fenazaquin (quinazoline class) and fenpyroximate (pyrazole class) had higher mite mortality and lower bee mortality over a 24 h exposure period in apiariums. These two compounds, plus spirotetramat and spirodiclofen, were selected for semi-field evaluation based on the findings of the apiarium bioassay trials and previous laboratory studies. Consistent with the apiarium bioassay, semi-field results showed fenazaquin and fenpyroximate had high efficacy (>80%), reducing Varroa abundance by 80% and 68%, respectively.

conclusionThese findings suggest that fenazaquin would be an effective Varroacide, along with fenpyroximate, which was previously registered for in-hive use as Hivastan. Both compounds have the potential to provide beekeepers with an alternative option for managing Varroa mites in honey bee colonies. © 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

VarroidaeAnimalsBeesBenzoatesPyrazolesQuinazolinesBenzoatesfenazaquinfenpyroximatePyrazolesQuinazolinesapiariumfenazaquinfenpyroximatehoney beeVarroa mite

Identifiers

PMID34994089
PMCPMC9303763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.