Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993920›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2022

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 genome on inanimate surfaces in COVID-19 intensive care units and emergency care cohort.

Thabata Coaglio Lucas, Cristiane Rocha Fagundes Moura, Raquel Aparecida Monteiro, Valéria da Silva Baracho, Cintia Maria Rodrigues, Kamila Lorene Soares Rocha, Paulo Henrique da Cruz Ferreira, Thyago José Silva, Etel Rocha-Vieira, Danilo Bretas de Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Turmeronols (A and B) fromBioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2023
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thabata Coaglio LucasDepartment of Nursing, Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil. thabataclucas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7850-8494
Cristiane Rocha Fagundes MouraDepartment of Biological Science, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Raquel Aparecida MonteiroNursing from intensive care unit, Santa Casa de Caridade de Diamantina, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Valéria da Silva BarachoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Santa Casa de Caridade de Diamantina, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Cintia Maria RodriguesDepartment of nursing, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Kamila Lorene Soares RochaDepartment of microbiology, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Paulo Henrique da Cruz FerreiraSanta Casa de Caridade de Diamantina, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Thyago José SilvaFaculty of medicine, Graduate Program on Health Science, Multicenter Graduate Program on Physiological Sciences, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Etel Rocha-VieiraFaculty of medicine, Graduate Program on Health Science, Multicenter Graduate Program on Physiological Sciences, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Danilo Bretas de OliveiraFaculty of medicine, Graduate Program on Health Science, Multicenter Graduate Program on Physiological Sciences, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUnderstanding the different transmission routes of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial in planning effective interventions in healthcare institutions. This study aimed to evaluate the presence of SARS-Cov-2 genome on inanimate surfaces in COVID-19 intensive care unit and emergency care cohorts.

methodsThis is a prospective cross-sectional study. Samples of the environmental surface of objects and furniture were collected between July 15 and October 15, 2020, at COVID-19 intensive and emergency care units. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 genome was determined by quantitative RT-qPCR. The positivity rate for SARS-Cov-2 genome is presented as the arithmetic mean of the sum of the values obtained in each collection. Values of 1.0, 0.5, and 0.0 were assigned for positive, indeterminate, and negative events, respectively.

resultsIn the intensive care unit, 86% of samples collected at the stethoscope and bed rail surfaces were positive. In the emergency care unit, 43% of bathroom tap, bed rails, and bedside table samples were positive. SARS-CoV-2 genome was not detected at the computer mouse and keyboard. At the emergency care unit, 14.3% of the samples from the collection room armchair were positive.

conclusionsSARS-CoV-2 genome can be found at the environmental surface of objects and furniture at COVID-19 care units. They can represent a potential source of indirect transmission pathway for COVID-19, especially within health service institutions.

Indexed as

COVID-19Emergency Medical ServicesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIntensive Care UnitsProspective StudiesRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2RNA, ViralEnvironment samplesMolecular epidemiologyPublic healthSARS-CoV-2 patientsSurface contamination

Identifiers

PMID34993920
PMCPMC8735889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.