Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993919›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2022

High levels of gut carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli in community settings in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Káris Maria de Pinho Rodrigues, Danielle Ferreira de Rezende, Michelle Pessanha Pinto, Samantha Dos Santos Tufic-Garutti, João Vitor Almeida Ramalho, Luís Guilherme de Araújo Longo, Valéria Brígido de Carvalho Girão, Gabriela Caramano de Oliveira, Lucas Cecílio Vilar, Beatriz Meurer Moreira

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Antimicrobial susceptibility and genetic profiles of Escherichia coli isolated from poultry hatcheries in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Káris Maria de Pinho RodriguesFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Danielle Ferreira de RezendeInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Michelle Pessanha PintoFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Samantha Dos Santos Tufic-GaruttiInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
João Vitor Almeida RamalhoFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Luís Guilherme de Araújo LongoInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Valéria Brígido de Carvalho GirãoInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Gabriela Caramano de OliveiraInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lucas Cecílio VilarInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Beatriz Meurer MoreiraInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. bmeurer@micro.ufrj.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1650-1382
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

conselho nacional de desenvolvimento científico e tecnológico 465718/2014-0conselho nacional de desenvolvimento científico e tecnológico CNPq312205/2019-8coordenação de aperfeiçoamento de pessoal de nível superior 001fundação carlos chagas filho de amparo à pesquisa do estado do rio de janeiro E-26/211.554/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence and risk factors for gut carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli among individuals living in the community in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of colonization with antimicrobial-resistant E. coli, including isolates producing ESBL and harboring plasmid-mediated quinolone resistant (PMQR) genes in this community. We performed a cross-sectional study and analyzed fecal specimens of individuals attending outpatient clinics in the city from January 2015 to July 2019. We investigated susceptibility to antimicrobial agents by disc diffusion tests and used PCR to determine ESBL types, PMQR, and the virulence genes that characterize an isolate as extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC). Among the 623 subjects, 212 (34%) carried an isolate resistant to at least one of the tested antimicrobial agents, with the highest frequencies of resistance to ampicillin (26%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (19%), cefazolin (14%), and ciprofloxacin (CIP, 9%). In addition, 13% (81) of subjects carried a multidrug-resistant-E. coli (MDR-E), including 47 (8% of all isolates) ESBL-producing E. coli (ESBL-E), mainly of CTX-M-8 (15, 32%) and CTX-M-15 (9, 20%) types. PMQR genes were present in 7% (42) of all isolates, including 60% (32) of the 53 resistant to CIP. Previous use of antimicrobial agents, particularly fluoroquinolones, was a risk factor for colonization with MDR-E (25%, 20/81 vs 13%, 70/542, p = 0.01), ESBL-E (28%, 13/47, vs 13%, 77/576, p = 0.01), and resistance to CIP (26%, 14/53, vs 12%, 70/570, p = 0.01). The most pathogenic phylogroups B2, C, and D were 37% of the MDR-E, 30% of the ESBL-E, 38% of the CIP-resistant, and 31% of PMQR gene carrying E. coli isolates. We show that carriage of MDR-E (mostly ESBL-E) reached high levels in the community in Rio de Janeiro, increased by the selection of antimicrobial agents. Much of the resistant E. coli isolates are potential pathogenic strains. The widespread use of antimicrobial agents during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil may have worsened this picture.

Indexed as

COVID-19Escherichia coli InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEscherichia coliHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Anti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesAntimicrobial resistanceCarriageESBLEscherichia coli

Identifiers

PMID34993919
PMCPMC8735885
OpenAlexW4206416659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.