Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993898›Full record

ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2022

Adherence and Persistence with Once-Daily vs Twice-Daily Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Real-World Analyses from the Netherlands, Italy and Germany.

Elisabeth Smits, Felicita Andreotti, Eline Houben, Harry J G M Crijns, Sylvia Haas, George Spentzouris, Tania Schink, Rosa Gini, Claudia Bartolini, Fernie Penning-van Beest and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Elisabeth SmitsPHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Van Deventerlaan 30-40, Utrecht, 3528 AE, The Netherlands. lisa.smits@pharmo.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1882-4748
Felicita AndreottiFondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Eline HoubenPHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Van Deventerlaan 30-40, Utrecht, 3528 AE, The Netherlands.
Harry J G M CrijnsDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1073-5337
Sylvia HaasFormerly Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
George SpentzourisDaiichi-Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Tania SchinkLeibniz Institute of Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0224-1866
Rosa GiniAgenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana, Firenze, Italy.
Claudia BartoliniAgenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana, Firenze, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8630-4598
Fernie Penning-van BeestPHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Van Deventerlaan 30-40, Utrecht, 3528 AE, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1906-9724
Ron HeringsPHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Van Deventerlaan 30-40, Utrecht, 3528 AE, The Netherlands.
Pharmo Institute · NLAgenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana · ITDaiichi Sankyo (Germany) · DELeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS · DEMaastricht University · NLTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDirect oral anticoagulants are available for patients with atrial fibrillation.

objectiveThis study compared adherence and persistence of once-daily (QD) vs twice-daily (BID) direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.

methodsA cohort study was conducted in three databases in the Netherlands, Italy and Germany. Patients with AF starting direct oral anticoagulants after drug approval date were included. The index date was the date of first dispensing. Study patients were restricted to those aged ≥ 18 years, ≥ 1 year database history and ≥ 1 year follow-up. Adherence to treatment was defined as the proportion of days covered ≥ 80% between the index date and the date of last dispensing of the index regimen (i.e. exposure period). The proportion of days covered was also determined during the 12-month follow-up. Persistence was defined as continuous use from index to treatment discontinuation.

resultsIn the Netherlands, Italy and Germany, respectively, 6068, 32,260 and 167,445 patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 70, 77 and 74 years, and 31%, 40% and 61% were QD users, all respectively. Among QD/BID users, 93/90%, 88/86% and 77/58%, respectively were adherent during the exposure period. Persistence rates at 1 year in QD/BID users were 60/59%, 13/14% and 46/31%, respectively.

conclusionsAdherence to treatment was high. In Germany, adherence was markedly higher in QD users compared with BID users. In Italy and the Netherlands, these differences were marginal. Persistence was low in all countries, but discontinuation was temporary. Only in Germany, persistence was markedly lower in BID users vs QD users.

Identifiers

PMID34993898
PMCPMC9114199
OpenAlexW4205741735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.