Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993882›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2022

Intravitreal Corticosteroid Implantation in Diabetic Macular Edema: Updated European Consensus Guidance on Monitoring and Managing Intraocular Pressure.

Francisco J Goñi, Keith Barton, José António Dias, Michael Diestelhorst, Julián Garcia-Feijoo, Anton Hommer, Laurent Kodjikian, Massimo Nicolò

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Francisco J GoñiOphthalmology Department, Mollet Hospital, Ronda dels Pinetons 6, 08100 Mollet del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain. francisgoni@yahoo.com.
Keith BartonGlaucoma Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
José António DiasHospital CUF Sintra, Lisbon, Portugal.
Michael DiestelhorstCenter for Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Julián Garcia-FeijooOphthalmology Department, Complutense University, San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Anton HommerSanatorium Hera, Vienna, Austria.
Laurent KodjikianDepartment of Ophthalmology, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Lyon, France.
Massimo NicolòUniversity Eye Clinic, DINOGMI, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genoa, Italy.
CUF Porto Hospital · PTHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESInstitut de Seguretat Pública de Catalunya · ESMoorfields Eye Hospital · GBOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravitreal therapy for diabetic macular edema can, in susceptible patients, increase intraocular pressure (IOP). As uncontrolled IOP can potentially be sight threatening, monitoring is an essential component of patient management. It can be challenging for retina specialists to ensure that monitoring is rigorous enough to detect and resolve any potential problems at the earliest opportunity without it also being overburdensome for patients who have the lowest risk of developing an IOP rise. We have developed dynamic algorithms that: (1) tailor the frequency and extent of monitoring according to individual susceptibility and current IOP and (2) assist retina specialists in deciding when they should consider a referral to a glaucoma specialist. One algorithm is for patients with a relatively low susceptibility to developing an IOP rise (those whose baseline IOP is < 22 mmHg and who do not have a history of IOP events). Depending on their first post-implantation IOP check, the algorithm classifies them as: low risk if IOP remains < 22 mmHg; medium risk if IOP is 22-25 mmHg and any rise from baseline is < 10 mmHg; or high risk if IOP is > 25 mmHg or any rise from baseline is ≥ 10 mmHg. Thereafter, the algorithm guides on the frequency and extent of monitoring required in each of these groups and, if IOP rises or falls during treatment, patients may move up or down the risk groups accordingly. A different algorithm is provided for patients who are more susceptible to developing an IOP rise (those with a baseline IOP of ≥ 22 mmHg or a prior history of an IOP event). These patients need monitoring more closely so this algorithm has only medium- or high-risk classifications. These algorithms update the previous monitoring guidance by Goñi et al. (Goñi et al. in Ophthalmol Ther 5:47-61, 2016).

Indexed as

ConsensusCorticosteroidDexamethasoneDiabetic macular edemaFluocinolone acetonideGlaucomaImplantIntraocular pressureIntravitrealTriamcinolone acetonide

Identifiers

PMID34993882
PMCPMC8770785
OpenAlexW4205865557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.