ArticleInternational ophthalmology2022
Implantation of intraocular lens without viscoelastic agent in phacoemulsification cataract surgery.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vitreous Substitutes in Vitreoretinal Surgery: From Native Vitreous Physiology to Bioengineered Experimental Replacements.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Implantation of intraocular lens without viscoelastic agent in phacoemulsification cataract surgery.International ophthalmology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo observe the clinical effect of implanting intraocular lens (IOL) without viscoelastic agent in phacoemulsification cataract surgery.
methodsA retrospective analysis of 87 patients (87 eyes) with senile cataracts was performed. According to whether viscoelastic agents were injected before IOL implantation, they were divided into 2 groups. The endothelial cell density (ECD), intraocular pressure (IOP), uncorrected distance visual acuities (UDVA), and operation complications were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively, and operation time was recorded.
resultsThe experimental group (no viscoelastic group) contained 42 cases (42 eyes), and the control group (viscoelastic group) contained 45 cases (45 eyes). The operation time of the experimental group (7.261 ± 0.75 s) was significantly shorter than that of the control group (7.802 ± 1.14 s) (t = -2.629, P = 0.01). The IOP of the experimental group (16.71 ± 2.04 mmHg) was significantly lower than that of the control group (19.56 ± 8.98 mmHg) at 4 h after surgery (t = -2.065, P = 0.04). There was no statistically significant difference in UCDV, ECD between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05). There were no complications of intraoperative PCR in both groups.
conclusionsImplantation of IOL without viscoelastic agent can shorten the operation time and reduce the occurrence of high IOP in the early postoperative period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34993842What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.