Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993836›Full record

Trial reportIrish journal of medical science2022

Effect of home-based high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training in patients with myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial.

Hazal Yakut, Hüseyin Dursun, Elvan Felekoğlu, Ahmet Anıl Başkurt, Aylin Özgen Alpaydın, Sevgi Özalevli

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Irish journal of medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04407624 (Effects of Intermittent Exercise Training Programs in Patients With Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04407624 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effects of Intermittent Exercise Training Programs in Patients With Myocardial Infarction

TypeinterventionalSponsorDokuz Eylul UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled34ConditionsMyocardial InfarctionArmsIntermittent Exercise, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hazal YakutDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4918-9249
Hüseyin DursunDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0215-9982
Elvan FelekoğluDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izmir Katip Çelebi University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6633-1572
Ahmet Anıl BaşkurtDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4711-8538
Aylin Özgen AlpaydınDepartment of Pulmonary Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Sevgi ÖzalevliSchool of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Dokuz Eylul University, 35340, Inciralti, Izmir, Turkey. sevgi.ozalevli@deu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5528-1036
Dokuz Eylül University · TREskişehir Osmangazi University · TRIzmir Kâtip Çelebi University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupervised high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been proposed to be more effective than moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) for improving exercise capacity, but there are not sufficient information effects of home-based HIIT and MICT in patients with myocardial infarction (MI).

aimsTo compare the effects of home-based HIIT and MICT in patients with MI.

methodsTwenty-one patients with MI were randomly assigned to one of two home-based exercise modes: HIIT group and MICT group. Home-based HIIT and MICT were performed twice a week for 12 weeks with an exercise intensity of 85-95% of heart rate (HR) reserve and 70-75% HR reserve, respectively. The primary outcome measure was functional capacity. Secondary outcomes included resting blood pressure and HR, peripheral oxygen saturation, pulmonary function and respiratory muscle strength, dyspnea severity, body composition (body fat%, body mass ındex (BMI), fat free muscle), peripheral muscle strength, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

resultsFunctional capacity, measured by 6-minute walk test, increased in HIIT and MICT group (p < 0.05). Resting BP and HR, body fat%, and BMI were significantly decreased, and pulmonary functions, respiratory-peripheral muscle strength, and HRQoL were significantly increased in the both groups (p < 0.05). Home-based HIIT was more effective than MICT in improving pulmonary functions and lower extremity muscle strength (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThis study suggests that HIIT and MICT can be applied at home-based in patients with MI and play an important role in improving functional capacity, health outcomes, and HRQoL.

trial registrationClinical Trials Number: NCT04407624.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Interval TrainingMyocardial InfarctionBlood PressureBody CompositionHumansQuality of LifeFunctional capacityHealth-related quality of lifeHigh-intensity interval trainingHome-based exerciseMyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID34993836
PMCPMC8736320
OpenAlexW4206753171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.