Trial reportIrish journal of medical science2022
Effect of home-based high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training in patients with myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Irish journal of medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04407624 (Effects of Intermittent Exercise Training Programs in Patients With Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Intermittent Exercise Training Programs in Patients With Myocardial Infarction
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exercise type and settings, quality of life, and mental health in coronary artery disease: a network meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effects of high-intensity interval training on cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in patients with myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on patient quality of life in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on exercise capacity and health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Brazilian journal of physical therapyPooled it
- Evaluating the Efficacy and Impact of Home-Based Cardiac Telerehabilitation on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- High-intensity interval training in rehabilitation of patients after myocardial infarction: a rapid review of randomized trials.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Quality of Life and Mental Health in Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Portuguese journal of public health · 2025Article
- High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Medium-Intensity Continuous Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Review
- The Role and Potential Mechanisms of Rehabilitation Exercise Improving Cardiac Remodeling.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSupervised high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been proposed to be more effective than moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) for improving exercise capacity, but there are not sufficient information effects of home-based HIIT and MICT in patients with myocardial infarction (MI).
aimsTo compare the effects of home-based HIIT and MICT in patients with MI.
methodsTwenty-one patients with MI were randomly assigned to one of two home-based exercise modes: HIIT group and MICT group. Home-based HIIT and MICT were performed twice a week for 12 weeks with an exercise intensity of 85-95% of heart rate (HR) reserve and 70-75% HR reserve, respectively. The primary outcome measure was functional capacity. Secondary outcomes included resting blood pressure and HR, peripheral oxygen saturation, pulmonary function and respiratory muscle strength, dyspnea severity, body composition (body fat%, body mass ındex (BMI), fat free muscle), peripheral muscle strength, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
resultsFunctional capacity, measured by 6-minute walk test, increased in HIIT and MICT group (p < 0.05). Resting BP and HR, body fat%, and BMI were significantly decreased, and pulmonary functions, respiratory-peripheral muscle strength, and HRQoL were significantly increased in the both groups (p < 0.05). Home-based HIIT was more effective than MICT in improving pulmonary functions and lower extremity muscle strength (p < 0.05).
conclusionsThis study suggests that HIIT and MICT can be applied at home-based in patients with MI and play an important role in improving functional capacity, health outcomes, and HRQoL.
trial registrationClinical Trials Number: NCT04407624.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.