Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993804›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Dynamic behavioral characteristics of carbon dioxide emissions from energy consumption: the role of shale technology.

Masoud Shirazi, Jurica Šimurina

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Masoud ShiraziFaculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal & Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. masoud.shirazi@uc.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9226-4729
Jurica ŠimurinaFaculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost IP-2019-04-4500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic behavioral analysis of carbon dioxide ([Formula: see text]) emissions to moderate the climate change helps to upgrade the developing measures utilized throughout the energy system decarbonization and mitigate global warming. Therefore, this research aims to analyze the role of the shale gas technology in behavioral characteristics of the US energy-related [Formula: see text] emissions. To this end, first, the Markov regime-switching methodology is used to assess the scale- and technology effects of the shale revolution on the switching-regimes for source-/sector-based [Formula: see text] emissions cycles of the US economy. Then, the dynamic network connectedness measures are utilized to determine the changes in the spillover effects between [Formula: see text] emissions cycle series by source/sector pre- and post-shale revolution. The findings indicate asymmetric and time-varying behavior of [Formula: see text] emissions cycles pre- and post-revolution. Particularly, the greater total spillover effect of the US source- and sector-based [Formula: see text] emissions network is accompanied with the higher speed of "downward" regime following the revolution that lowers environmental degradation of the US economy. Hence, utilization of the US economies of scale in the shale technology develops the coordinating mechanism, which can support the cooperative relationship between sources/sectors of the energy system in response to the risks, time and cost change, caused by the shale revolution.

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideNatural GasClimate ChangeGlobal WarmingTechnologyCarbon DioxideNatural GasAsymmetric behaviorCO2 EmissionsRegime switchingSpillover effect

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.