Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993766›Full record

ReviewClinical & experimental metastasis2022

Interconnected high-dimensional landscapes of epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity and stemness in cancer.

Sarthak Sahoo, Bazella Ashraf, Atchuta Srinivas Duddu, Adrian Biddle, Mohit Kumar Jolly

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarthak SahooCentre for BioSystems Science and Engineering (BSSE), Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India.
Bazella AshrafDepartment of Biotechnology, Central University of Kashmir, Ganderbal, India.
Atchuta Srinivas DudduCentre for BioSystems Science and Engineering (BSSE), Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India.
Adrian BiddleBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. a.biddle@qmul.ac.uk.
Mohit Kumar JollyCentre for BioSystems Science and Engineering (BSSE), Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India. mkjolly@iisc.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0002-6631-2109
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore · INCentral University of Kashmir · INQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V009494/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/S001573/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Establishing macrometastases at distant organs is a highly challenging process for cancer cells, with extremely high attrition rates. A very small percentage of disseminated cells have the ability to dynamically adapt to their changing micro-environments through reversibly switching to another phenotype, aiding metastasis. Such plasticity can be exhibited along one or more axes-epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity (EMP) and cancer stem cells (CSCs) being the two most studied, and often tacitly assumed to be synonymous. Here, we review the emerging concepts related to EMP and CSCs across multiple cancers. Both processes are multi-dimensional in nature; for instance, EMP can be defined on morphological, molecular and functional changes, which may or may not be synchronized. Similarly, self-renewal, multi-lineage potential, and resistance to anoikis and/or therapy may not all occur simultaneously in CSCs. Thus, understanding the complexity in defining EMP and CSCs is essential if we are to understand their contribution to cancer metastasis. This will require a more comprehensive understanding of the non-linearity of these processes. These processes are dynamic, reversible, and semi-independent in nature; cells traverse the inter-connected high-dimensional EMP and CSC landscapes in diverse paths, each of which may exhibit a distinct EMP-CSC coupling. Our proposed model offers a potential unifying framework for elucidating the coupled decision-making along these dimensions and highlights a key set of open questions to be answered.

Indexed as

Epithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionNeoplasmsHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsTumor MicroenvironmentCancer stem cellsEpithelial–mesenchymal plasticityLandscapeMetastasisPhenotypic plasticityStemness

Identifiers

PMID34993766
OpenAlexW4205598693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.