Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993749›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2022

"Mourning the Experience of What Should Have Been": Experiences of Peripartum Women During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Clayton J Shuman, Mikayla E Morgan, Jolyna Chiangong, Neha Pareddy, Philip Veliz, Alex Friedman Peahl, Vanessa K Dalton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Breastfeeding in times of COVID-19: a scoping review.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clayton J ShumanDepartment of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls, Ste. 4162, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5842, USA. clayshu@med.umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-9739
Mikayla E MorganDepartment of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls, Ste. 4162, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5842, USA.
Jolyna ChiangongDepartment of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls, Ste. 4162, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5842, USA.
Neha PareddyDepartment of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls, Ste. 4162, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5842, USA.
Philip VelizDepartment of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls, Ste. 4162, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5842, USA.
Alex Friedman PeahlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Vanessa K DaltonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe ongoing COVID-19 pandemic may significantly affect the peripartum experience; however, little is known about the perceptions of women who gave birth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, the purpose of our study was to describe the peripartum experiences of women who gave birth during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.

methodsUsing a cross-sectional design, we collected survey data from a convenience sample of postpartum women recruited through social media. Participants were 18 years of age or older, lived in the United States, gave birth after February 1, 2020, and could read English. This study was part of the COVID-19 Maternal Attachment, Mood, Ability, and Support study, which was a larger study that collected survey data describing maternal mental health and breastfeeding during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper presents findings from the two free-text items describing peripartum experiences. Using the constant comparative method, responses were thematically analyzed to identify and collate major and minor themes.

results371 participants responded to at least one free-text item. Five major themes emerged: (1) Heightened emotional distress; (2) Adverse breastfeeding experiences; (3) Unanticipated hospital policy changes shifted birthing plans; (4) Expectation vs. reality: "mourning what the experience should have been;" and (5) Surprising benefits of the COVID-19 pandemic to the delivery and postpartum experience. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Peripartum women are vulnerable to heightened stress induced by COVID-19 pandemic sequalae. During public health crises, peripartum women may need additional resources and support to improve their mental health, wellbeing, and breastfeeding experiences.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGriefHumansPandemicsPeripartum PeriodSARS-CoV-2United StatesBreastfeedingCoronavirusCOVID-19PostpartumPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34993749
PMCPMC8739000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.