Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993718›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2022

Neurodevelopmental Differences, Pedohebephilia, and Sexual Offending: Findings from Two Online Surveys.

Sara Jahnke, Alexander F Schmidt, Andrea Klöckner, Jürgen Hoyer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara JahnkeDepartment of Health Promotion and Development, University of Bergen, 5020, Bergen, Norway. sara.jahnke@uib.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9725-7384
Alexander F SchmidtDepartment of Psychology, Social & Legal Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Andrea KlöcknerInstitute for Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jürgen HoyerInstitute for Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Technische Universität Dresden · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neurodevelopmental theory of pedohebephilia states that sexual interests in children arise from early neurodevelopmental perturbations, as, for example, evidenced by increased non-right-handedness, more childhood head injuries, and reduced intelligence and height. As corroborating evidence largely rests on samples of convicted men, we conducted online surveys among German-speaking (Study 1, N = 199) and English-speaking men (Study 2, N = 632), specifically targeting community members with pedohebephilic or teleiophilic interests. Although we detected theoretically meaningful sexual interest patterns in an embedded viewing time task, we could not detect expected neurodevelopmental differences between teleiophilic and pedohebephilic men in either of the two studies. Strikingly, pedohebephilic men who reported convictions for sexual offenses emerged as shorter and less intelligent than pedohebephilic men without convictions in Study 2. While elucidating possible third variable confounds, results have to be interpreted cautiously because of the methodological problems inherent to non-matched case control designs.

Indexed as

Child Abuse, SexualPedophiliaSex OffensesBody HeightChildHumansMaleSexual BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesChild sexual abuseDSM-5EtiologyNeurobiologyNeurodevelopmentPedophilia

Identifiers

PMID34993718
PMCPMC8888371
OpenAlexW4221011117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.