Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993590›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2022

Simultaneous measurement of intra-epidermal electric detection thresholds and evoked potentials for observation of nociceptive processing following sleep deprivation.

Boudewijn van den Berg, Hemme J Hijma, Ingrid Koopmans, Robert J Doll, Rob G J A Zuiker, Geert Jan Groeneveld, Jan R Buitenweg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Boudewijn van den BergBiomedical Signals and Systems, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, PO Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands. b.van.den.berg@utwente.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3901-2645
Hemme J HijmaCentre for Human Drug Research, Zernikedreef 8, 2333 CL, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ingrid KoopmansCentre for Human Drug Research, Zernikedreef 8, 2333 CL, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Robert J DollCentre for Human Drug Research, Zernikedreef 8, 2333 CL, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7551-9072
Rob G J A ZuikerCentre for Human Drug Research, Zernikedreef 8, 2333 CL, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5604-0157
Geert Jan GroeneveldCentre for Human Drug Research, Zernikedreef 8, 2333 CL, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4655-6667
Jan R BuitenwegBiomedical Signals and Systems, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, PO Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-3981
Centre for Human Drug Research · NLUniversity of Twente · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen P14-12 (Project 2)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep deprivation has been shown to increase pain intensity and decrease pain thresholds in healthy subjects. In chronic pain patients, sleep impairment often worsens the perceived pain intensity. This increased pain perception is the result of altered nociceptive processing. We recently developed a method to quantify and monitor altered nociceptive processing by simultaneous tracking of psychophysical detection thresholds and recording of evoked cortical potentials during intra-epidermal electric stimulation. In this study, we assessed the sensitivity of nociceptive detection thresholds and evoked potentials to altered nociceptive processing after sleep deprivation in an exploratory study with 24 healthy male and 24 healthy female subjects. In each subject, we tracked nociceptive detection thresholds and recorded central evoked potentials in response to 180 single- and 180 double-pulse intra-epidermal electric stimuli. Results showed that the detection thresholds for single- and double-pulse stimuli and the average central evoked potential for single-pulse stimuli were significantly decreased after sleep deprivation. When analyzed separated by sex, these effects were only significant in the male population. Multivariate analysis showed that the decrease of central evoked potential was associated with a decrease of task-related evoked activity. Measurement repetition led to a decrease of the detection threshold to double-pulse stimuli in the mixed and the female population, but did not significantly affect any other outcome measures. These results suggest that simultaneous tracking of psychophysical detection thresholds and evoked potentials is a useful method to observe altered nociceptive processing after sleep deprivation, but is also sensitive to sex differences and measurement repetition.

Indexed as

NociceptionSleep DeprivationElectric StimulationEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePainPain ThresholdDetection slopeDetection thresholdEvoked potentialIntra-epidermal electric stimulationLinear mixed regressionNociceptive processingPainSexSleep deprivation

Identifiers

PMID34993590
PMCPMC8739349
OpenAlexW4205785010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.