Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993497›Full record

ArticleJAAD international2022

Hydrocolloid dressing versus conventional wound care after dermatologic surgery.

Samantha P Holmes, Sydney Rivera, Perry B Hooper, James E Slaven, Syril Keena T Que

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAAD international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05618912 nacompletednot on this map

Scar Appearance After Postoperative Hydrocolloid Dressing Versus Standard Petrolatum Ointment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled146ConditionsScar, Skin Scarring, Skin Cancer, Wound HealArmsHydrocolloid dressing, Petrolatum jelly dressing
NCT07064161 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of Hydrocolloid Dressing vs. Topical Antibiotic on Wound Healing of Post-Punch Biopsy Wounds Among Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in Manila

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Santo Tomas Hospital, PhilippinesRan2024 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsBiopsy WoundArmsMupirocin (drug), Hydrocolloid Dressing (DuoDERM CGF)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha P HolmesSchool of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Sydney RiveraSchool of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Perry B HooperSchool of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
James E SlavenDivision of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Syril Keena T QueSchool of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Indiana University School of MedicineIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHydrocolloid dressings (HCD) are helpful in chronic wound care, but research is limited in acute postoperative wounds. HCD can potentially be incorporated into a simplified wound care regimen after excisional surgeries.

objectiveTo examine whether a one-time HCD application after dermatologic surgery results in greater patient satisfaction and improved postoperative outcomes compared with conventional daily dressings (CDD).

methodsWe examined patients who underwent Mohs or standard surgical excision with linear closure followed by HCD. The patients additionally had a history of excisional surgery with CDD in the past 5 years. A modified version of the validated Bluebelle Wound Healing Questionnaire was administered.

resultsThe survey response rate was 74.4% (64/86). Compared with CDD, HCD rated higher in comfort, convenience, scar appearance, and simplicity of wound care instructions ( LIMITATIONS: Variability in time from prior dermatologic surgery may introduce recall bias. Prior surgeries involving CDD were sometimes performed by a different surgeon, which could introduce other confounding factors.

conclusionsA simplified wound care regimen involving HCD can potentially lead to increased comfort, convenience, simplicity, and a subjective improvement in scar appearance, though additional studies are needed.

Indexed as

CDD, conventional daily dressingDuoDERMexcisiongeneral dermatologyHCD, hydrocolloid dressinghealinghydrocolloid dressingMohs micrographic surgerypostoperativesurgerywound care

Identifiers

PMID34993497
PMCPMC8713109
OpenAlexW4200494208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.