Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993442›Full record

ReviewCJC open2021

Social Media as a Tool to Advance Women in Cardiology: Paving the Way for Gender Equality and Diversity.

Nooshin Beygui, Disha Bahl, Christina Mansour, Erin D Michos, Poonam Velagapudi, Julia Grapsa, Andrew Choi, Srihari S Naidu, Purvi Parwani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CJC open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Women in mechanical circulatory support: She persisted!Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nooshin BeyguiCentral Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA.
Disha BahlSt. George's University School of Medicine, Grenada, West Indies.
Christina MansourSchool of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Erin D MichosDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Poonam VelagapudiUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Julia GrapsaDepartment of Cardiology, Guys and St. Thomas NHS Hospitals Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew ChoiThe George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Srihari S NaiduDivision of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center, Westchester, New York, USA.
Purvi ParwaniDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the number of women in the field of medicine continues to rise, the discrimination against women and the gender inequity in both leadership roles and salary remains persistent. The gender divide is particularly prominent in male-dominated specialties, such as cardiology. Social media help foster global connections and disseminate information quickly and worldwide. The rise of social media has influenced how female physicians communicate and has shown its benefits particularly within the field of cardiology. Virtual platforms are important avenues where female physicians have united for greater representation of gender issues and advocacy efforts. Social media further amplify gender-equality activism by facilitating the conversations surrounding gender equity and proposing solutions to self-identified issues by the virtual community of female physicians and their allies. In this review, we discuss the role of social media as tools for advancing women in the field of cardiology and fostering gender equality and diversity.

Identifiers

PMID34993442
PMCPMC8712539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.