Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993435›Full record

ArticleCJC open2021

Gender Differences in the Role of Social Support for Hypertension Prevention in Canada: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging Cohort.

Zeinab Hosseini, Abdollah Safari, Nadia A Khan, Gerry Veenstra, Annalijn I Conklin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zeinab HosseiniCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Abdollah SafariData, Analytics, Statistics and Informatics (DASI), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Nadia A KhanDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Gerry VeenstraDepartment of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Annalijn I ConklinCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
St. Paul's Hospital · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relationship between social support and hypertension is poorly understood in women and men. We investigated whether multiple measures of social support are linked to blood pressure levels differentially by gender.

methodsCross-sectional study of 28,779 middle-age and older-age adults (45-85 years) in the baseline Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging comprehensive cohort. Stratified multivariable regression models estimated the role and relative contribution of 4 types of support to blood pressure in women and men.

resultsThe highest levels of perceived availability of informational, tangible, emotional, and belonging support were significantly associated with the lowest mean level of systolic blood pressure (SBP) but not diastolic blood pressure, independent of known confounders and other support types. However, associations were small, and their directions were more consistent in women. The lowest levels of informational support, relative to the highest, were associated with higher odds of hypertension in women (odds ratio [OR] = 1.20 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.06, 1.36]), more so than in men (OR = 1.16 [95% CI: 1.03, 1.32]). The lowest levels of emotional support were similarly associated with the odds of hypertension (OR = 1.08 [95% CI: 1.00, 1.17] in women and OR = 1.08 [95% CI: 1.00, 1.15] in men), relative to the highest. Larger differences in mean SBP in women, compared with men, were seen for informational support (2.43 and 1.18 mm Hg, respectively) and emotional support (1.60 and 0.74 mm Hg, respectively). Findings were unaltered by sensitivity analyses.

conclusionsInformational and emotional support were inversely associated with SBP, more so in women than men. Further longitudinal investigation is warranted, as results suggest that specific supports may help prevent hypertension and lower cardiovascular risk, especially in women.

Identifiers

PMID34993435
PMCPMC8712674
OpenAlexW3204944717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.