Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993127›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2021

Evaluation of Activated Charcoal as an Alternative to Antimicrobials for the Treatment of Neonatal Calf Diarrhea.

Joseph Ross, Crystal Schatz, Kendall Beaugrand, Sjoert Zuidhof, Brenda Ralston, Nick Allan, Merle Olson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph RossChinook Contract Research Inc., Airdrie, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0432-8383
Crystal SchatzChinook Contract Research Inc., Airdrie, AB, Canada.
Kendall BeaugrandChinook Contract Research Inc., Airdrie, AB, Canada.
Sjoert ZuidhofSjoert Zuidhof Consulting, Okotoks, AB, Canada.
Brenda RalstonAlberta Agriculture and Forestry, Airdrie, AB, Canada.
Nick AllanChinook Contract Research Inc., Airdrie, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1993-5554
Merle OlsonAlberta Veterinary Laboratories Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3654-7692
Chinook Regional Hospital · CAAgriculture Food and Rural Development · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeonatal calf diarrhea (NCD) is a major cause of death and economic loss in the cattle industry. Although NCD is caused by a variety of nutritional factors and non-bacterial pathogens, treatment typically includes systemic antimicrobial therapy, even for non-severe cases that are more likely to have non-bacterial causes. Novel, non-antimicrobial therapies are needed to reduce antimicrobial use and optimize production efficiency.

methodsThis production-level study compared the efficacy of activated charcoal to that of an antimicrobial regimen for treating mild-to-moderate cases of NCD, and identified the most common etiological agents. Calves diagnosed with non-severe diarrhea were randomly allocated into 3 treatment groups (n = 86 per group): group A received a standard antimicrobial regimen, B received both antimicrobials and activated charcoal, and C received activated charcoal only. Animals were monitored over the course of 7 days for mortality and recovery from diarrhea. Fecal samples were collected upon enrollment (day 0) and on day 7 to assess the presence of major NCD-causing pathogens.

resultsMortality was higher for groups B and C relative to A, although this difference was only statistically significant for group B vs A. No significant difference in the number of recovered animals was observed among the treatment groups, although group C was significantly slower to recover than A or B. The vast majority of day 0 samples were positive for non-bacterial organisms (mainly rotavirus and

conclusionAntimicrobials only moderately improved outcomes for non-severe diarrhea cases relative to activated charcoal. Thus, systemic antimicrobial treatment is likely unnecessary for the majority of NCD cases and should be limited to severe cases.

Indexed as

activated charcoalantimicrobial stewardshipcryptosporidiumnon-bacterialrotavirusscours

Identifiers

PMID34993127
PMCPMC8714008
OpenAlexW4200303565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.