Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993108›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

Predicting the Ki-67 proliferation index in pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients presenting with subsolid nodules: construction of a nomogram based on CT images.

Jing Yan, Xing Xue, Chen Gao, Yifan Guo, Linyu Wu, Changyu Zhou, Feng Chen, Maosheng Xu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring the efficacy ofAbdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jing Yan *The First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Xing Xue *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Chen GaoThe First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Yifan GuoThe First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Linyu WuThe First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Changyu ZhouThe First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Feng ChenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Maosheng XuThe First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Ki-67 proliferation index (PI) reflects the proliferation of cells. However, the conventional methods for the acquisition of the Ki-67 PI, such as surgery and biopsy, are generally invasive. This study investigated a potential noninvasive method of predicting the Ki-67 PI in patients with lung adenocarcinoma presenting with subsolid nodules.

methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 153 patients who presented with pulmonary adenocarcinoma appearing as subsolid nodules (SSNs) on computed tomography (CT) images between January 2015 and December 2018. Presence of LUAD with SSNs was confirmed by histopathology. Of these participants, 107 patients were from institution 1 and were divided into a training cohort and an internal validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio. The other 46 patients were from institution 2 and were enrolled as an external validation cohort. All patients underwent conventional CT scans with thin-slice (≤1.25 mm) reconstruction, and 1,316 quantitative radiomic features were extracted from the CT images for each nodule. The minimum redundancy maximum relevance and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator were used for feature selection, and the radiomics signature was constructed based on these selected features. Clinical features were examined using univariate logistic regression analysis. The nomogram was developed based on the radiomics signature and the independent clinical risk factors. The Delong test and

resultsThe diameter of the nodules [odds ratio (OR) =1.17; P=0.003] was identified as an independent predictive parameter. Both the radiomics signature and the nomogram suggested a good predictive probability for Ki-67 expression. For the radiomics signature, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the training cohort, the internal validation cohort, and the external validation cohort was 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77 to 0.95], 0.81 (95% CI: 0.64 to 0.98), and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.62 to 0.91), respectively. For the nomogram, the AUC for the training cohort, the internal validation cohort, and the external validation cohort was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.77 to 0.95), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.64 to 0.97), and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.65 to 0.94), respectively. There were no statistical differences in the AUCs between the radiomics signature and the radiomic nomogram in the training cohort or the validation cohorts (all P>0.05).

conclusionsThe nomogram provides a novel strategy for determining the Ki-67 PI in predicting the proliferation of subsolid nodules, which may be beneficial for the management of patients with SSNs.

Indexed as

Ground glass noduleKi-67nomogramradiomicssubsolid nodule

Identifiers

PMID34993108
PMCPMC8666773
OpenAlexW3196449450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.