ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Breast arterial calcifications as an indicator of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: comparative analysis of coronary computed tomography scoring systems and carotid intima-media thickness.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breast arterial calcifications on mammography and risk of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast arterial calcification (BAC) is easily detected and commonly observed on screening mammography. That is more frequent among people with diabetes, and these people are at risk of coronary artery disease. The incidence of BAC increases with advancing age. We aimed to determine whether BAC detected by mammography is associated with the development of coronary atherosclerosis in asymptomatic women. It can help reduce morbidity and mortality secondary to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
methodsWe included one hundred and eighty women over the age of 40 who underwent mammography screening in this multi-modality study. Mammography evaluated the presence of calcifications, the number of involved arteries, and the distribution. We questioned the patients about cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes. The coronary artery disease severity was assessed according to both Agatston and calcium scores on coronary computed tomography (CT). Besides, the relationship between these scores and correlation with carotid artery intima-media thickness was investigated. We stated mean and standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and reported frequency distributions and percentages. SPSS software version 25.0 was used to perform the analysis.
resultsOverall, 302 of 3,600 cases were positive for BAC. However, 120 of them could be included in the study by the eligibility criteria of our research. In univariate analysis, age, hyperlipidemia, DM, HT, and smoking history were risk factors that significantly affected BAC development. The impact of age and diabetes were maintained in the logistic regression analysis (P<0.005), while the significant effect of the other variables was vanished (P>0.02). Furthermore, moderate and high BAC scores were correlated with higher coronary atherosclerosis scores.
conclusionsBAC may predict an additional risk factor for coronary artery disease, particularly in patients having higher scores. That may be an accurate indicator for subsequent development of coronary arterial calcifications so that it may be possible to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with coronary atherosclerosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.