ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Inferring CT perfusion parameters and uncertainties using a Bayesian approach.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-time planar angiographic cerebral perfusion imaging.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Beyond the numbers: what CT perfusion reveals - and what it cannot - about ischemic brain tissue.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- A Novel Self-Supervised Learning-Based Method for Dynamic CT Brain Perfusion Imaging.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Investigation of the hyperperfusion phenomenon following carotid artery stenting using preoperative computed tomography perfusion imaging.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputed tomography perfusion imaging is commonly used for the rapid assessment of patients presenting with symptoms of acute stroke. Maps of perfusion parameters, such as cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and mean transit time (MTT) derived from the perfusion scan data, provide crucial information for stroke diagnosis and treatment decisions. Most CT scanners use singular value decomposition (SVD)-based methods to calculate these parameters. However, some known problems are associated with conventional methods.
methodsIn this work, we propose a Bayesian inference algorithm, which can derive both the perfusion parameters and their uncertainties. We apply the variational technique to the inference, which then becomes an expectation-maximization problem. The probability distribution (with Gaussian mean and variance) of each estimated parameter can be obtained, and the coefficient of variation is used to indicate the uncertainty. We perform evaluations using both simulations and patient studies.
resultsIn a simulation, we show that the proposed method has much less bias than conventional methods. Then, in separate simulations, we apply the proposed method to evaluate the impacts of various scan conditions, i.e., with different frame intervals, truncated measurement, or motion, on the parameter estimate. In one patient study, the method produced CBF and MTT maps indicating an ischemic lesion consistent with the radiologist's report. In a second patient study affected by patient movement, we showed the feasibility of applying the proposed method to motion corrected data.
conclusionsThe proposed method can be used to evaluate confidence in parameter estimation and the scan protocol design. More clinical evaluation is required to fully test the proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.