Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993079›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

Two-stage multitask U-Net construction for pulmonary nodule segmentation and malignancy risk prediction.

Yangfan Ni, Zhe Xie, Dezhong Zheng, Yuanyuan Yang, Weidong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dual-branch feature fusion S3D V-Net network for lung nodules segmentation.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Habitat-based radiomics analysis for evaluating immediate response in colorectal cancer lung metastases treated by radiofrequency ablation.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yangfan NiLaboratory for Medical Imaging Informatics, Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Shanghai, China.
Zhe XieLaboratory for Medical Imaging Informatics, Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Shanghai, China.
Dezhong ZhengLaboratory for Medical Imaging Informatics, Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Shanghai, China.
Yuanyuan YangLaboratory for Medical Imaging Informatics, Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Shanghai, China.
Weidong WangBiological Engineering Research Center, The General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate segmentation of pulmonary nodules is important for image-driven nodule analysis and nodule malignancy risk prediction. However, due to interobserver variability caused by manual segmentation, an accurate and robust automatic segmentation method has become an essential task. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to construct an accurate segmentation and malignant risk prediction algorithm for pulmonary nodules.

methodsIn the present study, we proposed a coarse-to-fine 2-stage framework consisting of the following 2 convolutional neural networks: a 3D multiscale U-Net used for localization and a 2.5D multiscale separable U-Net (MSU-Net) used for segmentation refinement. A multitask framework was proposed for nodules' malignancy risk prediction. Features from encoding and decoding paths of MSU-Net were integrated for pathology or morphology characteristic classification.

resultsExperimental results showed that our method achieved state-of-art results on the Lung Image Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative dataset. The proposed method achieved a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 83.04% and an overlapping error of 27.47% on the dataset. Our method achieved accuracy of 77.8% and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 84.3% for malignancy risk prediction. Moreover, we compared our method with the inter-radiologist agreement, and the average DSC difference was only 0.39%.

conclusionsThe results showed the effectiveness of the multitask end-to-end framework. The coarse-to-fine 2.5D strategy increased the accuracy and efficiency of pulmonary nodule segmentation and malignancy risk prediction of the computer-aided diagnosis system. In clinical practice, doctors can obtain accurate morphological characteristics and quantitative information of nodules by using the proposed method, so as to make future treatment plan.

Indexed as

2.5D multiscale separable U-Net (2.5D MSU-Net)convolutional neural network (CNN)malignancy risk predictionPulmonary nodule segmentationrefinement segmentation framework

Identifiers

PMID34993079
PMCPMC8666775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.