Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993066›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

Diagnostic accuracy of qualitative MRI in 550 paediatric brain tumours: evaluating current practice in the computational era.

Luke Dixon, Gurpreet Kaur Jandu, Jai Sidpra, Kshitij Mankad

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Luke DixonDepartment of Neuroradiology, Imperial University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Gurpreet Kaur JanduCardiff University Medical School, Cardiff, UK.
Jai SidpraDevelopmental Biology and Cancer Section, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Kshitij MankadDevelopmental Biology and Cancer Section, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Cardiff University · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate the accuracy of qualitative reporting of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the classification of paediatric brain tumours.

methodsPreoperative MRI reports of 608 children prior to resection or biopsy of an intracranial lesion were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 550 children had complete radiological and histopathological notes, thereby reaching our inclusion criteria. Concordance between MRI report and final histopathological diagnosis was assessed using an established lexicon derived from the WHO 2016 classification of CNS tumours. Levels of agreement based on cellular origin, tumour type, and tumour grade were evaluated. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, confidence intervals, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

resultsDiagnostic accuracy differed significantly between tumour types and tumour grades. Sensitivities were highest for ependymomas and sellar, pituitary, pineal, and cranial and/or paraspinal nerve tumours (range 80.65-100%). Sensitivity was slightly lower for astrocytic gliomas, oligodendrogliomas, and choroid plexus, neuronal, mixed neuronal-glial, embryonal, and histiocytic tumours (range 63.33-79.59%). Low sensitivities were noted for meningiomas and mesenchymal non-meningothelial, melanocytic, and germ cell tumours (range 0-56.25%). The most correct tumour type predictions were made in the posterior fossa whilst the most incorrect predictions were made in the lobar regions, pineal/tectal plate area, and the supratentorial ventricles.

conclusionsThis is the largest published series investigating the predictive accuracy of MRI in paediatric brain tumours. We show that diagnostic accuracy varies greatly by tumour type and location. Looking forward, we should develop and leverage computational methods to improve accuracy in the tumour types and anatomical locations where qualitative diagnostic accuracy is lower.

Indexed as

Brainbrain tumourdiagnostic imagingmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)neoplasmneuro-oncology

Identifiers

PMID34993066
PMCPMC8666750
OpenAlexW3178491363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.