Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993061›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

Clot burden of acute pulmonary thromboembolism: comparison of two deep learning algorithms, Qanadli score, and Mastora score.

Hongxia Zhang, Yan Cheng, Zhenbo Chen, Xinying Cong, Han Kang, Rongguo Zhang, Xiaojuan Guo, Min Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. CT-Derived Features as Predictors of Clot Burden and Resolution.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hongxia ZhangDepartment of Radiology, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yan ChengIntensive Care Unit, Erlonglu Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, China.
Zhenbo ChenDepartment of Radiology, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xinying CongDepartment of Radiology, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing, China.
Han KangInstitute of AI-Advanced Research, Infervision Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Rongguo ZhangInstitute of AI-Advanced Research, Infervision Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Xiaojuan GuoDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Min LiuDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe deep learning convolution neural network (DL-CNN) benefits evaluating clot burden of acute pulmonary thromboembolism (APE). Our objective was to compare the performance of the deep learning convolution neural network trained by the fine-tuning [DL-CNN (ft)] and the deep learning convolution neural network trained from the scratch [DL-CNN (fs)] in the quantitative assessment of APE.

methodsWe included the data of 680 cases for training DL-CNN by DL-CNN (ft) and DL-CNN (fs), then retrospectively included 410 patients (137 patients with APE, 203 males, mean age 60.3±11.4 years) for testing the models. The distribution and volume of clots were respectively assessed by DL-CNN(ft) and DL-CNN(fs), and sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate their performances in detecting clots on a per-patient and clot level. Radiologists evaluated the distribution of clots, Qanadli score, and Mastora score and right ventricular metrics, and the correlation of clot volumes with right ventricular metrics were analyzed with Spearman correlation analysis.

resultsOn a per-patient level, the two DL-CNN models had high sensitivities and moderate specificities [DL-CNN (ft): 100% and 77.29%; DL-CNN (fs): 100% and 75.82%], and their AUCs were comparable (Z=0.30, P=0.38). On a clot level, DL-CNN (ft) and DL-CNN (fs) sensitivities and specificities in detecting central clots were 99.06% and 72.61%, and 100% and 70.63%, respectively. DL-CNN (ft) sensitivities and specificities in detecting peripheral clots were mostly higher than those of DL-CNN (fs), and their AUCs were comparable. Clot volumes measured with the two models were similar (U=85094.500, P=0.741), and significantly correlated with Qanadli scores [DL-CNN(ft) r=0.825, P<0.001, DL-CNN(fs) r=0.827, P<0.001] and Mastora scores [DL-CNN(ft) r=0.859, P<0.001, DL-CNN(fs) r=0.864, P<0.001]. Clot volumes were also correlated with right ventricular metrics. Clot burdens were increased in the low-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk patients. Binary logistic regression revealed that only the ratio of right ventricular area/left ventricular area (RVa/LVa) was an independent predictor of in-hospital death (odds ratio 6.73; 95% CI, 2.7-18.12, P<0.001).

conclusionsBoth DL-CNN (ft) and DL-CNN (fs) have high sensitivities and moderate specificities in detecting clots associated with APE, and their performances are comparable. While clot burdens quantitatively calculated by the two DL-CNN models are correlated with right ventricular function and risk stratification, RVa/LVa is an independent prognostic factor of in-hospital death in patients with APE.

Indexed as

acute pulmonary embolism (APE)clot burdencomputed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA)Deep learning (DL)

Identifiers

PMID34993061
PMCPMC8666760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.