ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Efficacy of
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and external validation of radiomics models to detect primary prostate cancer with machine learning: a multicenter study based onJournal of the National Cancer Center · 2026Article
- Non-invasive diagnosis strategy integrating PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for patients with suspected prostate cancer: a multi-center study.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive Value of Quantitative ADC, SUVmax, and the SUVmax/ADC Ratio for Biological Behavior and Prognosis in High-Risk Prostate Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The value ofDiscover oncology · 2024Article
- The Role of [Cancers · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis retrospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the combined application of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) and
methodsThe 105 patients with suspected PCa included in the study underwent bpMRI and PET/CT. BpMRI examinations included conventional sequences and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences. Major lesions were qualitatively diagnosed according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). A PET/CT scan was started 60 min after intravenous
resultsOf the 105 patients, 68 patients were diagnosed with PCa, and 37 patients had benign prostatic lesions. With a PI-RADS score ≥3 as the diagnostic threshold, the accuracy of bpMRI in identifying benign and malignant prostate lesions was similar to that of PET/CT (SUV
conclusionsThe combined application of bpMRI and PET improves the accuracy of the qualitative diagnosis of prostate lesions, and its diagnostic efficacy for risk stratification in patients with intermediate- to high-risk PCa is similar to that of PET/CT and higher than that of bpMRI alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.