Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34992962›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2021

Cervical Artery Dissection in Young Women: Risk of Recurrence During Subsequent Pregnancies.

Myriam Assif, Catherine Lamy, Solène De Gaalon, Yolande Caroit, Romain Bourcier, Cécile Preterre, Benoit Guillon

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recurrence of cervical artery dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Myriam AssifStroke Unit (MA, SDG, CP, BG), Nantes University Hospital; Department of Neurology (CL), Paris Descartes University, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (YC), Nantes University Hospital; Department of Neuroradiology (RB), Nantes University Hospital, France.
Catherine LamyStroke Unit (MA, SDG, CP, BG), Nantes University Hospital; Department of Neurology (CL), Paris Descartes University, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (YC), Nantes University Hospital; Department of Neuroradiology (RB), Nantes University Hospital, France.
Solène De GaalonStroke Unit (MA, SDG, CP, BG), Nantes University Hospital; Department of Neurology (CL), Paris Descartes University, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (YC), Nantes University Hospital; Department of Neuroradiology (RB), Nantes University Hospital, France.
Yolande CaroitStroke Unit (MA, SDG, CP, BG), Nantes University Hospital; Department of Neurology (CL), Paris Descartes University, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (YC), Nantes University Hospital; Department of Neuroradiology (RB), Nantes University Hospital, France.
Romain BourcierStroke Unit (MA, SDG, CP, BG), Nantes University Hospital; Department of Neurology (CL), Paris Descartes University, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (YC), Nantes University Hospital; Department of Neuroradiology (RB), Nantes University Hospital, France.
Cécile PreterreStroke Unit (MA, SDG, CP, BG), Nantes University Hospital; Department of Neurology (CL), Paris Descartes University, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (YC), Nantes University Hospital; Department of Neuroradiology (RB), Nantes University Hospital, France.
Benoit GuillonStroke Unit (MA, SDG, CP, BG), Nantes University Hospital; Department of Neurology (CL), Paris Descartes University, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (YC), Nantes University Hospital; Department of Neuroradiology (RB), Nantes University Hospital, France.
Nantes Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the risk of recurrence of cervical artery dissection (CAD) during pregnancy and puerperium in women with a history of CAD and then help physicians with providing medical information to women who wish to become pregnant.

methodsWomen aged 16-45 years who were admitted to our center for a CAD between 2005 and 2017 were identified from the hospital database, and those with spontaneous and symptomatic CAD were included. They were then contacted to answer a questionnaire that was specifically designed in regard to the recurrence of CAD and pregnancies after the primary CAD.

resultsNinety-one patients satisfied our inclusion criteria, and 89 were included in the analysis. During a median follow-up of 7.0 years, 4 women (4.4%) had recurrent CAD, although none during pregnancy or puerperium. Eighteen women (20%) had a total of 20 full-term pregnancies, occurring at least 6 months after CAD. Of these 20 pregnancies, 13 (65%) were vaginal deliveries, and 7 (35%) were cesarean sections. The reason for the absence of pregnancies after the initial CAD was unrelated to the vascular event in 89% of cases, but 8% of the women had been advised by a physician to avoid any future pregnancy or they had been recommended to undergo abortion or sterilization.

conclusionIn this study, there were no CAD recurrences during subsequent pregnancies or postpartum, irrespective of the type of delivery. Thus, pregnancy after a history of CAD appears to be safe.

Identifiers

PMID34992962
PMCPMC8723925
OpenAlexW3153454892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.