Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34992877›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2021

Verification of electron beam parameters in an intraoperative linear accelerator using dosimetric and radiobiological response methods.

Agnieszka Dróżdż, Martyna Waluś, Marcin Zieliński, Bożena Malesa, Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska, Katarzyna Kulcenty, Beata Adamczyk, Piotr Nowaczyk, Julian Malicki, Jacek Pracz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Design and performance validation of a novel 3d printed thin-walled and transparent electron beam applicators for intraoperative radiation therapy with beam energy up to 12 MeV.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
  2. Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Agnieszka DróżdżNational Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Swierk, Poland.
Martyna WaluśNational Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Swierk, Poland.
Marcin ZielińskiNational Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Swierk, Poland.
Bożena MalesaNational Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Swierk, Poland.
Marta Kruszyna-MochalskaMedical Physics Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland.
Katarzyna KulcentyRadiobiology Lab, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland.
Beata AdamczykBreast Surgical Oncology Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland.
Piotr NowaczykBreast Surgical Oncology Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland.
Julian MalickiMedical Physics Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland.
Jacek PraczDepartment of Nuclear Equipment HITEC, National Centre For Nuclear Research, Swierk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe availability of linear accelerators (linac) for research purposes is often limited and therefore alternative radiation sources are needed to conduct radiobiological research. The National Centre for Radiation Research in Poland recently developed an intraoperative mobile linac that enables electron irradiation at energies ranging from 4 to 12 MeV and dose rates of 5 or 10 Gy/min. The present study was conducted to evaluate the electron beam parameters of this intraoperative linac and to verify the set-up to evaluate out-of-field doses in a water phantom, which were determined through dosimetric and biological response measurements. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe distribution of radiation doses along and across the radiation beam were measured in a water phantom using a semiconductor detector and absolute doses using an ionisation chamber. Two luminal breast cancer cell lines (T-47D and HER2 positive SK-BR-3) were placed in the phantom to study radiation response at doses ranging from 2 to 10 Gy. Cell response was measured by clonogenic assays. RESULTS AND

conclusionThe electron beam properties, including depth doses and profiles, were within expected range for the stated energies. These results confirm the viability of this device and set-up as a source of megavoltage electrons to evaluate the radiobiological response of tumour cells.

Indexed as

breast cancerclonogenic assayelectron acceleratorintraoperative radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID34992877
PMCPMC8726448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.