Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34992759›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2022

What's in a name? A data-driven method to identify optimal psychotherapy classifications to advance treatment research on co-occurring PTSD and substance use disorders.

Denise A Hien, Skye Fitzpatrick, Lissette M Saavedra, Chantel T Ebrahimi, Sonya B Norman, Jessica Tripp, Lesia M Ruglass, Teresa Lopez-Castro, Therese K Killeen, Sudie E Back and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Denise A HienCenter of Alcohol & Substance Use Studies, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6954-2882
Skye FitzpatrickDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1347-1827
Lissette M SaavedraRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8880-0624
Chantel T EbrahimiCenter of Alcohol & Substance Use Studies, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5128-5200
Sonya B NormanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4751-1882
Jessica TrippDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5836-629X
Lesia M RuglassCenter of Alcohol & Substance Use Studies, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3676-5358
Teresa Lopez-CastroDepartment of Psychology, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2521-6329
Therese K KilleenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5142-0908
Sudie E BackDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7683-8737
Antonio A Morgan-LópezRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4706-9964

Funding

Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data for PTSD/AODsR01AA025853 · NIAAA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI HIEN, DENISE AIMEE, MORGAN-LOPEZ, ANTONIO A · 2018 to 2021
$1.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA025853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Objective: The present study leveraged the expertise of an international group of posttraumatic stress and substance use disorder (PTSD+SUD) intervention researchers to identify which methods of categorizing interventions which target SUD, PTSD, or PTSD+SUD for populations with both PTSD+SUD may be optimal for advancing future systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and comparative effectiveness studies which strive to compare effects across a broad variety of psychotherapy types. Method: A two-step process was used to evaluate the categorization terminology. First, we searched the literature for pre-existing categories of PTSD+SUD interventions from PTSD+SUD clinical trials, systematic and literature reviews. Then, we surveyed international trauma and substance use subject matter experts about their opinions on pre-existing intervention categorization and ideal categorization nomenclature. Results: Mixed method analyses revealed that a proliferation of PTSD+SUD treatment research over the last twenty years brought with it an abundance of ways to characterize the treatments that have been evaluated. Results from our survey of experts ( Conclusion: One possible categorization (trauma-focused/non-trauma focused) was identified. Revised language and nomenclature for classification of PTSD+SUD treatments are needed in order to accommodate the needs of this advancing field.

Indexed as

Expert TestimonyStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSubstance-Related DisordersTerminology as TopicDiagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)HumansPsychotherapySurveys and Questionnairesco-occurring disordersdual diagnosisPosttraumatic stress disordersubstance use disordertreatment classification

Identifiers

PMID34992759
PMCPMC8725709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.