Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34992674›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2021

Assessment of Effective Network Connectivity among MEG None Contaminated Epileptic Transitory Events.

Abir Hadriche, Ichrak Behy, Amal Necibi, Abdennaceur Kachouri, Chokri Ben Amar, Nawel Jmail

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abir HadricheREGIM Lab, ENIS, Sfax University, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2908-0230
Ichrak BehyDigital Research Center of Sfax, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6258-7503
Amal NecibiMIRACL Lab, Sfax University, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6816-1183
Abdennaceur KachouriLETI Lab, ENIS, Sfax University, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3357-2569
Chokri Ben AmarREGIM Lab, ENIS, Sfax University, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0129-7577
Nawel JmailMIRACL Lab, Sfax University, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0823-9641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterizing epileptogenic zones EZ (sources responsible of excessive discharges) would assist a neurologist during epilepsy diagnosis. Locating efficiently these abnormal sources among magnetoencephalography (MEG) biomarker is obtained by several inverse problem techniques. These techniques present different assumptions and particular epileptic network connectivity. Here, we proposed to evaluate performances of distributed inverse problem in defining EZ. First, we applied an advanced technique based on Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to recover only pure transitory activities (interictal epileptiform discharges). We evaluated our technique's robustness in separation between transitory and ripples versus frequency range, transitory shapes, and signal to noise ratio on simulated data (depicting both epileptic biomarkers and respecting time series and spectral properties of realistic data). We validated our technique on MEG signal using detector precision on 5 patients. Then, we applied four methods of inverse problem to define cortical areas and neural generators of excessive discharges. We computed network connectivity of each technique. Then, we confronted obtained noninvasive networks to intracerebral EEG transitory network connectivity using nodes in common, connection strength, distance metrics between concordant nodes of MEG and IEEG, and average propagation delay. Coherent Maximum Entropy on the Mean (cMEM) proved a high matching between MEG network connectivity and IEEG based on distance between active sources, followed by Exact low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (eLORETA), Dynamical Statistical Parametric Mapping (dSPM), and Minimum norm estimation (MNE). Clinical performance was interesting for entire methods providing in an average of 73.5% of active sources detected in depth and seen in MEG, and vice versa, about 77.15% of active sources were detected from MEG and seen in IEEG. Investigated problem techniques succeed at least in finding one part of seizure onset zone. dSPM and eLORETA depict the highest connection strength among all techniques. Propagation delay varies in this range [18, 25]ms, knowing that eLORETA ensures the lowest propagation delay (18 ms) and the closet one to IEEG propagation delay.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrainComputational BiologyComputer SimulationConnectomeDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedEpilepsyFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleModels, NeurologicalSignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID34992674
PMCPMC8727131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.