Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34992488›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2021

Team-Based Learning and Lecture-Based Learning: Comparison of Sudanese Medical Students' Performance.

Karim Eldin M A Salih, El-Fatih Z El-Samani, Jalal Ali Bilal, Emtinan K Hamid, Omer Abdelgadir Elfaki, Muawia E A Idris, Hind A Elsiddig, Maha M Salim, Hashim Missawi, Mohammed Abass and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Escape Intern Orientation! - A Capstone and Team Building Activity for New EM Interns.Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Karim Eldin M A SalihDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bahri, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID 0000-0002-0681-0827
El-Fatih Z El-Samani *Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Ahfad University for Women, Khartoum, Sudan.
Jalal Ali BilalDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Shaqra University, Shaqra, Saudi Arabia.
Emtinan K HamidDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
Omer Abdelgadir ElfakiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Education Unit, Al-Rayan Medical Colleges, Medina Munawara, Saudi Arabia.
Muawia E A IdrisDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bahri, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID 0000-0002-0132-7086
Hind A ElsiddigDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bahri, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID 0000-0003-3982-4667
Maha M SalimDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bahri, Khartoum, Sudan.
Hashim MissawiDepartment of Pathology, Maternity and Children Hospital, Medina Munawara, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AbassDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.ORCID 0000-0003-2923-1075
Walyeldin ElfakeyDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bahri, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID 0000-0002-3416-5693

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimStudents' performance in TBL compared to LBL needs to be evaluated. This study aimed to compare students' performance in team-based learning and traditional lectures.

methodsA total of 176 class 4 and 202 class 6 medical students from University of Bahri, Khartoum, Sudan, participated in the study during 2018. Experienced staff were selected to conduct the teaching and assessment of the two groups, using the standard team-based learning procedure (iRAT, gRAT and AppT) in the first topic and the lecture-based learning procedure in the second, within the same time limit for the two methods.

resultsThe two classes overall mean score has a significant 5.1 points difference (p<0.001; 95% CI: 3.5, 6.0). Separate analysis showed consistency of superiority of TBL to LBL in either gender. A remarkable difference was observed when we compared the two methods in class 6 separately from class 4. Class 6 mean score was high for both TBL and LBL (77.2 and 70.2, respectively), with a significant mean difference of 7.0 (p<0.001; 95% CI: 5.1, 8.9). In class 4, the score was lower for both methods (mean of 62.8 for TBL and 59.9 for LBL). The mean difference of 2.95 points was still significant (p<0.05; 95% CI: 0.46, 5.43). Separate multivariate linear regression for TBL and LBL showed no significant difference in performance of males and females in either method. Controlling for gender in TBL, class 4 had a mean of -14.26 points, (p<0.001; 95% CI: -12.54, -15.98) less than class 6. Similarly, in LBL, class 4 had a mean of -10.18 points (p<0.001, 95% CI: -7.02, -13.35), less than class 6.

conclusionStudents' performance using team-based learning was superior to lecture-based learning, irrespective of students' gender, noticeable among senior students.

Indexed as

assessmentcurriculumlecture-based curriculummedical educationteam-based learning

Identifiers

PMID34992488
PMCPMC8713705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.