ReviewClinical and experimental gastroenterology2021
Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: Identifying High-Risk Patients.
Review in Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07257926 (Prevention of Delayed Post-polypectomy Bleeding by Endoscopic Sucralfate Spray in High-risk Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prevention of Delayed Post-polypectomy Bleeding by Endoscopic Sucralfate Spray in High-risk Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Trial: Precise Administration of Sucralfate Powder in Prevention of Delayed Postpolypectomy Bleeding. A Randomized Controlled Trial.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2025Trial
- Prevention of Delayed Bleeding after Endoscopic Resection using Gel Hemostatic Powder: A Multicentric Open-lapel Prospective Study.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Targeted In-Defect Clipping After Colonic Endoscopic Resection: A Prospective Feasibility Study.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Scarred and complex colorectal polyps: Traditional techniques and emerging alternatives.World journal of methodology · 2025Review
- Effects of early diet resumption on the incidence of complications following polypectomy: A randomized controlled trial.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Chronic Kidney Disease Increases Risk of Delayed Post-Polypectomy Bleeding: A Large-Scale Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Article
- Delphi consensus statement for the management of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Effect of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy on Colon Postpolypectomy Bleeding in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- Outcomes of thin versus thick-wire snares for cold snare polypectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Establishment of a model for predicting delayed post-polypectomy bleeding: A real-world retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) is a potentially severe complication of therapeutic colonoscopy which can result in hospital readmission and re-intervention. Over the last decade, rates of DPPB reported in the literature have fallen from over 2% to 0.3-1.2%, largely due to improvements in resection technique, a shift towards cold snare polypectomy, better training, adherence to guidelines on periprocedural antithrombotic management, and the use of antithrombotics with more favourable bleeding profiles. However, as the complexity of polypectomy undertaken worldwide increases, so does the importance of identifying patients at increased risk of DPPB. Risk factors can be categorised according to patient, polyp and personnel related factors, and their integration together to provide an individualised risk score is an evolving field. Strategies to reduce DPPB include safe practices relevant to all patients undergoing colonoscopy, as well as specific considerations for patients identified to be high risk. This narrative review sets out an evidence-based summary of factors that contribute to the risk of DPPB before discussing pragmatic interventions to mitigate their risk and improve patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.