Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34992380›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2021

Bandura's Self-Efficacy Model Used to Explore Participants' Experiences of Health, Lifestyle, and Work After Attending a Vocational Rehabilitation Program with Lifestyle Intervention - A Focus Group Study.

Anita Dyb Linge, Stål Kapstø Bjørkly, Chris Jensen, Bente Hasle

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03286374 (Do Change in Life Style Improve Work Ability? A Controlled Study of the Effect of Changes in Lifestyle on Work Participation.), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03286374 nacompletednot on this map

Do Change in Life Style Improve Work Ability? A Controlled Study of the Effect of Changes in Lifestyle on Work Participation.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMolde University CollegeRan2017 to 2019Enrolled95ConditionsObesity, Morbid, Sick-leave, Work Related Illnesses, Life StyleArmsOccupational rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anita Dyb LingeFaculty of Social Science and History, Volda University College, Volda, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5638-5497
Stål Kapstø BjørklyFaculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7523-1757
Chris JensenNorwegian National Advisory Unit on Occupational Rehabilitation, Rauland, Norway.
Bente HasleFaculty of Social Science and History, Volda University College, Volda, Norway.
Volda University College · NOMolde University College · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to use the self-efficacy model to examine the participants' experience, attitudes, and viewpoints regarding the association between work, health and lifestyle factors that influence work participation after completing a new one-year multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation (VR) programme with a lifestyle intervention for people on or at risk of sick leave due to obesity or obesity-related problems. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis case study was based on focus group (FG) interviews with 11 previous participants. The interviews were conducted 2 to 4 years after they completed the program, between August and September 2019. The analysis followed Braun and Clarke's six-phase reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) approach.

resultsThe main theme "Work participation enhances quality of life" was prominent and related to mastery experience. Four sub-themes directly and indirectly affect work participation. The first sub-theme is "My attitude to life", influenced by mastery experiences. Next, "Body size matters", related to physiological and affective states. "Good physical capacity profit in everyday life" is associated to physiological and affective states, and the last "Support from the surroundings" influenced by vicarious experience and Verbal Persuasion.

conclusionThis study's main finding highlights how participants value work participation as a meaningful activity that positively influences their work self-efficacy. Future VR programs should pay attention to interventions focusing on the workplace, cognitive approaches to develop skills for coping strategies, lifestyle change purposing BMI reduction, physical activity, and support from the surroundings. CLINICAL TRIALS: Technical information about the study on Clinical Trials NCT03286374.

Indexed as

obesityoccupational healthself-efficacyvocational rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID34992380
PMCPMC8714017
OpenAlexW4200483892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.