ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2021
The correlation between professional quality of life and mental health outcomes among hospital personnel during the Covid-19 pandemic in Taiwan.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Clinical Competencies and Professional Quality of Life Associated With Nurses' Culturally Competent Cancer Care for LGBT Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Psychological distress among Ukrainian displaced persons 2 years after the full-scale invasion: a contextual benchmark comparison.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The Unseen Toll: Impact of COVID-19 on Professional Quality of Life of Healthcare Workers.Cureus · 2025Article
- Influence of psychological resilience on compassion fatigue in nurses in the operating room: a cross-sectional study in China.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on quality of life using surveys and Mendelian randomization.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Compassion fatigue in healthcare providers: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Professional quality of life and its associated factors among Vietnamese doctors and nurses.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress during the 2022 Russo-Ukrainian war, a comparison between populations in Poland, Ukraine, and Taiwan.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Depression and quality of life among Afghan healthcare workers: A cross-sectional survey study.BMC psychology · 2023Article
- 'Caring for the helpers': factors associated with professional quality of life among Hong Kong nurses during the fifth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2023Article
- Fear of COVID-19 Impact on Professional Quality of Life among Mental Health Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigated the association between professional quality of life, working context, and mental health outcomes among hospital personnel in Taiwan during the worldwide upsurge in COVID-19 cases. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe recruited 503 hospital personnel to whom we administered online questionnaires containing items from the Professional Quality of Life (ProQoL) scale, which covers compassion satisfaction (CS), burnout (BO) and compassion fatigue (CF), the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and questions on work-related variables. Data were collected from 13 July to 19 August 2020.
resultsThe participants generally reported moderate CS and BO and low CF. Overall prevalence of mild-to-extremely-severe stress, anxiety and depression was 24.5%, 39.6% and 31.2%, respectively. Multiple logistic regression revealed that moderate-to-high BO and CF correlated with increased risks of mild-to-extremely-severe stress (OR = 4.17 and 2.23, respectively), anxiety (OR = 4.86 and 2.81, respectively) and depression (OR = 5.83 and 3.01, respectively), while moderate-to-high CS correlated with reduced risks of stress (OR = 0.53) and depression (OR = 0.45) only. There were CS and BO differences in groups categorized by marital status and profession. Anxiety increased linearly by seniority <10, 10-19 and ≥20 years (p for trend <0.05).
conclusionIn conclusion, the subscales of ProQOL, BO and CF appeared to be associated with increased risks of stress, anxiety and depression among hospital personnel during the COVID-19 epidemic. A long-term contingency program may be needed to adjust work context variables and support emotional well-being of these workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.