Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34992304›Full record

ArticleBiometrika2020

Inference under unequal probability sampling with the Bayesian exponentially tilted empirical likelihood.

A Yiu, R J B Goudie, B D M Tom

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrika, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bayesian computation via empirical likelihood.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  6. Semiparametric Approach to a Random Effects Quantile Regression Model.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2011
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A YiuMedical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SR, U.K.
R J B GoudieMedical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SR, U.K.
B D M TomMedical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SR, U.K.
MRC Biostatistics Unit · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fully Bayesian inference in the presence of unequal probability sampling requires stronger structural assumptions on the data-generating distribution than frequentist semiparametric methods, but offers the potential for improved small-sample inference and convenient evidence synthesis. We demonstrate that the Bayesian exponentially tilted empirical likelihood can be used to combine the practical benefits of Bayesian inference with the robustness and attractive large-sample properties of frequentist approaches. Estimators defined as the solutions to unbiased estimating equations can be used to define a semiparametric model through the set of corresponding moment constraints. We prove Bernstein-von Mises theorems which show that the posterior constructed from the resulting exponentially tilted empirical likelihood becomes approximately normal, centred at the chosen estimator with matching asymptotic variance; thus, the posterior has properties analogous to those of the estimator, such as double robustness, and the frequentist coverage of any credible set will be approximately equal to its credibility. The proposed method can be used to obtain modified versions of existing estimators with improved properties, such as guarantees that the estimator lies within the parameter space. Unlike existing Bayesian proposals, our method does not prescribe a particular choice of prior or require posterior variance correction, and simulations suggest that it provides superior performance in terms of frequentist criteria.

Indexed as

Bayesian method of momentsBernstein–von Mises theoremDouble robustnessExponentially tilted empirical likelihoodM-estimationSelection bias

Identifiers

PMID34992304
PMCPMC7612173
OpenAlexW4236087424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.