Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34992147›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2022

Highly rigid H3.1/H3.2-H3K9me3 domains set a barrier for cell fate reprogramming in trophoblast stem cells.

Masashi Hada, Hisashi Miura, Akie Tanigawa, Shogo Matoba, Kimiko Inoue, Narumi Ogonuki, Michiko Hirose, Naomi Watanabe, Ryuichiro Nakato, Katsunori Fujiki and 9 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Conserved and divergent features of trophoblast stem cells.Journal of molecular endocrinology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Masashi HadaBioresource Engineering Division, Bioresource Center, RIKEN, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan.
Hisashi MiuraLaboratory for Developmental Epigenetics, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe 650-0047, Japan.
Akie TanigawaLaboratory for Developmental Epigenetics, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe 650-0047, Japan.
Shogo MatobaBioresource Engineering Division, Bioresource Center, RIKEN, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0474-232X
Kimiko InoueBioresource Engineering Division, Bioresource Center, RIKEN, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan.
Narumi OgonukiBioresource Engineering Division, Bioresource Center, RIKEN, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan.
Michiko HiroseBioresource Engineering Division, Bioresource Center, RIKEN, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan.
Naomi WatanabeBioresource Engineering Division, Bioresource Center, RIKEN, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan.
Ryuichiro NakatoInstitute of Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3019-5817
Katsunori FujikiInstitute of Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan.
Ayumi HasegawaBioresource Engineering Division, Bioresource Center, RIKEN, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan.
Akihiko SakashitaDepartment of Molecular Biology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Hiroaki OkaeDepartment of Informative Genetics, Environment and Genome Research Center, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.
Kento MiuraBioresource Engineering Division, Bioresource Center, RIKEN, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan.
Daiki ShikataBioresource Engineering Division, Bioresource Center, RIKEN, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan.
Takahiro ArimaDepartment of Informative Genetics, Environment and Genome Research Center, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.
Katsuhiko ShirahigeInstitute of Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan.
Ichiro HirataniLaboratory for Developmental Epigenetics, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe 650-0047, Japan.
Atsuo OguraBioresource Engineering Division, Bioresource Center, RIKEN, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan.
RIKEN BioResource Research Center · JPQuantitative BioSciences · USPioneer (United States) · USRIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research · JPTohoku University · JPHiroshima University · JPKeio University · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The placenta is a highly evolved, specialized organ in mammals. It differs from other organs in that it functions only for fetal maintenance during gestation. Therefore, there must be intrinsic mechanisms that guarantee its unique functions. To address this question, we comprehensively analyzed epigenomic features of mouse trophoblast stem cells (TSCs). Our genome-wide, high-throughput analyses revealed that the TSC genome contains large-scale (>1-Mb) rigid heterochromatin architectures with a high degree of histone H3.1/3.2-H3K9me3 accumulation, which we termed TSC-defined highly heterochromatinized domains (THDs). Importantly, depletion of THDs by knockdown of CAF1, an H3.1/3.2 chaperone, resulted in down-regulation of TSC markers, such as

Indexed as

HistonesTrophoblastsAnimalsCell DifferentiationFemaleMammalsMicePlacentaPregnancyStem CellsHistonesCAF1H3.1/H3.2H3K9me3somatic cell nuclear transfertrophoblast stem cell

Identifiers

PMID34992147
PMCPMC8763053
OpenAlexW4205808980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.