Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34992139›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Dopamine firing plays a dual role in coding reward prediction errors and signaling motivation in a working memory task.

Stefania Sarno, Manuel Beirán, Joan Falcó-Roget, Gabriel Diaz-deLeon, Román Rossi-Pool, Ranulfo Romo, Néstor Parga

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Early emergence of perceptual biases in the secondary somatosensory cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Representation of a perceptual bias in the prefrontal cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Human Substantia Nigra Neurons Encode Reward Expectations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefania SarnoDepartamento de Física Teórica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain; unabuonaora@gmail.com ranulfo.romo@gmail.com nestor.parga@uam.es.ORCID 0000-0003-4793-4452
Manuel BeiránDepartamento de Física Teórica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Joan Falcó-RogetDepartamento de Física Teórica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Gabriel Diaz-deLeonInstituto de Fisiología Celular, Departamento de Neurociencia Cognitiva, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 México City, México.
Román Rossi-PoolInstituto de Fisiología Celular, Departamento de Neurociencia Cognitiva, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 México City, México.ORCID 0000-0001-8941-4311
Ranulfo RomoInstituto de Fisiología Celular, Departamento de Neurociencia Cognitiva, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 México City, México; unabuonaora@gmail.com ranulfo.romo@gmail.com nestor.parga@uam.es.
Néstor PargaDepartamento de Física Teórica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain; unabuonaora@gmail.com ranulfo.romo@gmail.com nestor.parga@uam.es.
Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México · MXUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about how dopamine (DA) neuron firing rates behave in cognitively demanding decision-making tasks. Here, we investigated midbrain DA activity in monkeys performing a discrimination task in which the animal had to use working memory (WM) to report which of two sequentially applied vibrotactile stimuli had the higher frequency. We found that perception was altered by an internal bias, likely generated by deterioration of the representation of the first frequency during the WM period. This bias greatly controlled the DA phasic response during the two stimulation periods, confirming that DA reward prediction errors reflected stimulus perception. In contrast, tonic dopamine activity during WM was not affected by the bias and did not encode the stored frequency. More interestingly, both delay-period activity and phasic responses before the second stimulus negatively correlated with reaction times of the animals after the trial start cue and thus represented motivated behavior on a trial-by-trial basis. During WM, this motivation signal underwent a ramp-like increase. At the same time, motivation positively correlated with accuracy, especially in difficult trials, probably by decreasing the effect of the bias. Overall, our results indicate that DA activity, in addition to encoding reward prediction errors, could at the same time be involved in motivation and WM. In particular, the ramping activity during the delay period suggests a possible DA role in stabilizing sustained cortical activity, hypothetically by increasing the gain communicated to prefrontal neurons in a motivation-dependent way.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDopamineDopaminergic NeuronsMaleMemory, Short-TermMesencephalonMotivationDopaminedopamine activityinternal biasmotivationramping DAworking memory

Identifiers

PMID34992139
PMCPMC8764687
OpenAlexW4205525601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.