Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34992122›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2022

Evaluation of compliance with early postbirth follow-up and unnecessary visits to the paediatric emergency department: a prospective observational study at the Lenval Children's Hospital in Nice.

Antoine Tran, Anne-Laure Hérissé, Marion Isoardo, Petri Valo, Anne-Marie Maillotte, Hervé Haas, Dominique Donzeau, Emma Freyssinet, Christian Pradier, Stéphanie Gentile

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02863627 (What Care Pathways for Newborns Consulting Pediatric Emergencies? Prospective Study Over One Year Newborn Pediatric Emergencies), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02863627 nacompletednot on this map

What Care Pathways for Newborns Consulting Pediatric Emergencies? Prospective Study Over One Year Newborn Pediatric Emergencies (NNUP)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondation LenvalRan2016 to 2017Enrolled280ConditionsEmergenciesArmsNewborn Care Pathway
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Antoine TranPaediatric Emergency Department, Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL, Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France tran.a@pediatrie-chulenval-nice.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-1836-2742
Anne-Laure HérisséPaediatric Emergency Department, Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL, Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France.
Marion IsoardoPaediatric Emergency Department, Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL, Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France.
Petri ValoPaediatric Emergency Department, Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL, Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France.
Anne-Marie MaillotteNeonatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France.
Hervé HaasPaediatric Emergency Department, Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL, Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France.
Dominique DonzeauDepartment of Clinical Research and Innovation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France.
Emma FreyssinetPaediatric Emergency Department, Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL, Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France.
Christian PradierMedical School, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Stéphanie GentileEquipe de Recherche EA 3279 - Centre d'Études et de Recherche sur les Services de Santé et la Qualité de Vie, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3858-9503

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate compliance with the French National Authority for Health's (Haute Autorité de Santé, HAS) postbirth follow-up recommendations for newborns attending our paediatric emergency department (PED) and identify risk factors associated with non-compliance and unnecessary emergency department utilisation.

designProspective, single centre.

settingFourth biggest PED in France in terms of attendance (CHU-Lenval). PATIENTS: 280 patients of whom 249 were included in the statistical analysis.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome of this study was the evaluation of compliance of the care pathway for newborns consulting at the PED with respect to the French postbirth follow-up recommendations. Secondary outcome was the assessment of whether the visit to the PED was justified by means of PED reception software and two postconsultation interviews

results77.5% (193) of the newborns had non-compliant care pathways and 43% (107) of PED visits were unnecessary. Risk factors associated with a non-compliance regarding the HAS's postbirth follow-up recommendations were: unnecessary visit to the PED (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.9), precariousness (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 6.2), birth in a public maternity hospital (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.8) and no information about HAS's postbirth follow-up recommendations on discharge from maternity ward (OR 11.4, 95% CI 5.8 to 23.3). Risk factors for unnecessary PED visits were: non-compliant care pathway (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.9) and a first medical visit at a PED (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.1).

conclusionPostbirth follow-up may lead to decrease unnecessary emergency department visits unnecessary emergency department visits. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study bears the clinical trial number NCT02863627.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHospitals, PediatricChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfant, NewbornPatient DischargePregnancyProspective Studiesorganisation of health servicespaediatric A&E and ambulatory careperinatologyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID34992122
PMCPMC8739427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.