Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34992119›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2022

Effectiveness of conditional cash transfers (Afya credits incentive) to retain women in the continuum of care during pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period in Kenya: a cluster-randomised trial.

Fedra Vanhuyse, Oliver Stirrup, Aloyce Odhiambo, Tom Palmer, Sarah Dickin, Jolene Skordis, Neha Batura, Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli, Alex Mwaki, Andrew Copas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03021070 (Afya Credit Incentives for Improved Maternal and Child Health Outcomes in Kenya), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03021070 naunknown statusnot on this map

Afya Credit Incentives for Improved Maternal and Child Health Outcomes in Kenya

TypeinterventionalSponsorOnyango SangoroRan2017 to 2019Enrolled7,200ConditionsMaternal and Child HealthArmsConditional cash transfer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fedra VanhuyseStockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden fedra.vanhuyse@sei.org.ORCID 0000-0002-9283-1914
Oliver StirrupInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Aloyce OdhiamboSafe Water and AIDS Project, Kisumu, Kenya.
Tom PalmerInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Sarah DickinStockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jolene SkordisInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Neha BaturaInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8175-8125
Hassan Haghparast-BidgoliInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6365-2944
Alex MwakiSafe Water and AIDS Project, Kisumu, Kenya.
Andrew CopasInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8968-5963
University College London · GBStockholm Environment Institute · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGiven high maternal and child mortality rates, we assessed the impact of conditional cash transfers (CCTs) to retain women in the continuum of care (antenatal care (ANC), delivery at facility, postnatal care (PNC) and child immunisation).

designWe conducted an unblinded 1:1 cluster-randomised controlled trial.

setting48 health facilities in Siaya County, Kenya were randomised. The trial ran from May 2017 to December 2019.

participants2922 women were recruited to the control and 2522 to the intervention arm.

interventionsAn electronic system recorded attendance and triggered payments to the participant's mobile for the intervention arm (US$4.5), and phone credit for the control arm (US$0.5). Eligibility criteria were resident in the catchment area and access to a mobile phone. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Primary outcomes were any ANC, delivery, any PNC between 4 and 12 months after delivery, childhood immunisation and referral attendance to other facilities for ANC or PNC. Given problems with the electronic system, primary outcomes were obtained from maternal clinic books if participants brought them to data extraction meetings (1257 (50%) of intervention and 1053 (36%) control arm participants). Attendance at referrals to other facilities is not reported because of limited data.

resultsWe found a significantly higher proportion of appointments attended for ANC (67% vs 60%, adjusted OR (aOR) 1.90; 95% CI 1.36 to 2.66) and child immunisation (88% vs 85%; aOR 1.74; 95% CI 1.10 to 2.77) in intervention than control arm. No intervention effect was seen considering delivery at the facility (90% vs 92%; aOR 0.58; 95% CI 0.25 to 1.33) and any PNC attendance (82% vs 81%; aOR 1.25; 95% CI 0.74 to 2.10) separately. The pooled OR across all attendance types was 1.64 (1.28 to 2.10).

conclusionsDemand-side financing incentives, such as CCTs, can improve attendance for appointments. However, attention needs to be paid to the technology, the barriers that remain for delivery at facility and PNC visits and encouraging women to attend ANC visits within the recommended WHO timeframe.

trial registrationNCT03021070.

Indexed as

MotivationParturitionAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChildContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHumansKenyaPregnancycommunity child healthmaternal medicinepublic health

Identifiers

PMID34992119
PMCPMC8739676
OpenAlexW4206773380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.