Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34992105›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Residents transitioning between hospital and care homes: protocol for codesigning a systems-level response to safety issues (SafeST study).

Jason Scott, Katie Brittain, Kate Byrnes, Pam Dawson, Stephanie Mulrine, Michele Spencer, Justin Waring, Lesley Young-Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jason ScottFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK jason.scott@northumbria.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7031-2171
Katie BrittainPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Kate ByrnesFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Pam DawsonSchool of Sport, Health and Wellbeing, Plymouth Marjon University, Plymouth, UK.
Stephanie MulrineFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Michele SpencerNorth Tyneside Community and Health Care Forum, North Shields, UK.
Justin WaringHealth Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Lesley Young-MurphyNHS North Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group, North Shields, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study is to develop a better understanding of incident reporting in relation to transitions in care between hospital and care home, and to codesign a systems-level response to safety issues for patients transitioning between hospital and care home. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Two workstreams (W) will run in parallel. W1 will aim to develop a taxonomy of incident reporting in care homes, underpinned by structured interviews (N=150) with care home representatives, scoping review of care home incident reporting systems, and a review of incident reporting policy related to care homes. The taxonomy will be developed using a standardised approach to taxonomy development. W2 will be structured in three phases (P). P1a will consist of ≤40 interviews with care home staff to develop a better understanding of their specific internal systems for reporting incidents, and P1b will include ≤30 interviews with others involved in transitions between hospital and care home. P1a and P1b will also examine the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on safe transitions. P2 will consist of a retrospective documentary analysis of care home data relating to resident transitions, with data size and sampling determined based on data sources identified in P1a. A validated data extraction form will be adapted before use. P3 will consist of four validation and codesign workshops to develop a service specification using National Health Service Improvement's service specification framework, which will then be mapped against existing systems and recommendations produced. Framework analysis informed by the heuristic of systemic risk factors will be the primary mode of analysis, with content analysis used for analysing incident reports. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received university ethical approval and Health Research Authority approval. Findings will be disseminated to commissioners, providers and regulators who will be able to use the codesigned service specification to improve integrated care.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyPatient TransferState MedicineCOVID-19HospitalsHumansRetrospective Studieshealth policyqualitative researchquality in health carerisk management

Identifiers

PMID34992105
PMCPMC8739053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.