Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34991915›Full record

SynthesisPatient education and counseling2022

Racial and ethnic disparities in communication study enrollment for young people with cancer: A descriptive analysis of the literature.

Bryan A Sisk, Megan Keenan, Melody S Goodman, Argentina E Servin, Lauren H Yaeger, Jennifer W Mack, James M DuBois

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Patient education and counseling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bryan A SiskDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: siskb@wustl.edu.
Megan KeenanDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Melody S GoodmanSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Argentina E ServinDepartment of Medicine, University of California - San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Lauren H YaegerBernard Becker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jennifer W MackPediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
James M DuBoisDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USNew York University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aimed to evaluate the racial and ethnic diversity of study participants in recent pediatric cancer communication literature.

methodsWe systematically searched for communication studies in pediatric oncology published between January 2018 and September 2020, limiting analysis to US studies. We considered race and ethnicity as separate categories in our analysis. Two authors screened studies and abstracted characteristics of race and ethnicity reporting and enrollment.

resultsOf 98 articles included in this analysis, many studies failed to report participants' race (21/98) and ethnicity (40/98). Most studies ascertained race and ethnicity by self-report (51/98); 25 studies did not describe how they ascertained race and ethnicity. White participants were overrepresented in studies relative to the US population (median 80% in studies vs 72% in 2020 US census). Racial and ethnic minorities were underrepresented (Black: 7% vs 14%; Asian: 4% vs 7%; Pacific Islander: 0% vs 0.5%; Native American: 0.5% vs 3%; Hispanic 8% vs 19%).

conclusionCommunication literature in pediatric oncology underrepresents all racial and ethnic minority populations and is inconsistent in the reporting of race and ethnicity. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Future work should follow best practices to ensure this literature adequately represents the experiences of all families in pediatric oncology.

Indexed as

EthnicityNeoplasmsAdolescentChildCommunicationHispanic or LatinoHumansMinority GroupsUnited StatesAdolescentCommunicationDisparityMinorityPediatric oncology

Identifiers

PMID34991915
PMCPMC9203904
OpenAlexW4200306251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.