Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34991714›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2022

Land-use intensification differentially affects bacterial, fungal and protist communities and decreases microbiome network complexity.

Sana Romdhane, Aymé Spor, Samiran Banerjee, Marie-Christine Breuil, David Bru, Abad Chabbi, Sara Hallin, Marcel G A van der Heijden, Aurélien Saghai, Laurent Philippot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Sana RomdhaneDepartment of Agroecology, University Bourgogne Franche Comte, INRAE, AgroSup Dijon, Dijon, France.
Aymé SporDepartment of Agroecology, University Bourgogne Franche Comte, INRAE, AgroSup Dijon, Dijon, France.
Samiran BanerjeeAgroscope, Plant-Soil Interactions Group, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marie-Christine BreuilDepartment of Agroecology, University Bourgogne Franche Comte, INRAE, AgroSup Dijon, Dijon, France.
David BruDepartment of Agroecology, University Bourgogne Franche Comte, INRAE, AgroSup Dijon, Dijon, France.
Abad ChabbiECOSYS, UMR INRAE, AgroParisTech, Thiverval-Grignon, France.
Sara HallinDepartment of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Marcel G A van der HeijdenAgroscope, Plant-Soil Interactions Group, Zurich, Switzerland.
Aurélien SaghaiDepartment of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Laurent PhilippotDepartment of Agroecology, University Bourgogne Franche Comte, INRAE, AgroSup Dijon, Dijon, France. Laurent.philippot@inrae.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3461-4492
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEAgroscope · CHCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

agence nationale de la recherche ANR-16-EBI3-0004-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSoil microbial communities are major drivers of cycling of soil nutrients that sustain plant growth and productivity. Yet, a holistic understanding of the impact of land-use intensification on the soil microbiome is still poorly understood. Here, we used a field experiment to investigate the long-term consequences of changes in land-use intensity based on cropping frequency (continuous cropping, alternating cropping with a temporary grassland, perennial grassland) on bacterial, protist and fungal communities as well as on their co-occurrence networks.

resultsWe showed that land use has a major impact on the structure and composition of bacterial, protist and fungal communities. Grassland and arable cropping differed markedly with many taxa differentiating between both land use types. The smallest differences in the microbiome were observed between temporary grassland and continuous cropping, which suggests lasting effects of the cropping system preceding the temporary grasslands. Land-use intensity also affected the bacterial co-occurrence networks with increased complexity in the perennial grassland comparing to the other land-use systems. Similarly, co-occurrence networks within microbial groups showed a higher connectivity in the perennial grasslands. Protists, particularly Rhizaria, dominated in soil microbial associations, as they showed a higher number of connections than bacteria and fungi in all land uses.

conclusionsOur findings provide evidence of legacy effects of prior land use on the composition of the soil microbiome. Whatever the land use, network analyses highlighted the importance of protists as a key element of the soil microbiome that should be considered in future work. Altogether, this work provides a holistic perspective of the differential responses of various microbial groups and of their associations to agricultural intensification.

Indexed as

Land-use intensificationMicrobial communitiesNetworks

Identifiers

PMID34991714
PMCPMC8740439
OpenAlexW4206671688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.